Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33029262›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Venous thromboembolism prevention protocol for adapting prophylaxis recommendations to the potential risk post total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial.

Mariam A Alameri, Syed A Syed Sulaiman, Abdullah M Ashour, Ma'ad F Al-Saati

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04031859 (The Effectiveness of a Risk Stratification Procedure for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Total Knee Replacement Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04031859 phase2completednot on this map

The Effectiveness of a Risk Stratification Procedure for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Total Knee Replacement Surgeries

TypeinterventionalSponsorMinistry of Health, Saudi ArabiaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled242ConditionsTotal Knee Replacement SurgeriesArmsacetylsalicylic acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariam A AlameriDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Science Malaysia. Penang (Malaysia). m_alamiri15@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1369-6620
Syed A Syed SulaimanDirector. Advanced Institute of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Science Malaysia. Penang (Malaysia). sazhar@usm.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-2802
Abdullah M AshourDeputy Director & Director of Residency Training Programme. Division Head and Consultant of Arthroplasty and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Orthopaedics Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City. Riyadh (Saudi Arabia). abuhadeel@gmail.com.
Ma'ad F Al-SaatiChairmen of the Orthopedic Department. King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University. Riyadh (Saudi Arabia). mfalsaati@kaauh.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee replacement (TKR) is a major orthopedic surgery that is considered high risk for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes that resulted from the use of a new proposed VTE risk stratification protocol for selecting a suitable extended VTE prophylaxis for post TKR surgery patients administered in conjunction with patient education programs.

methodA randomized controlled trial was conducted in two medical centers in Saudi Arabia. A total of 242 patients were enrolled in the study, 121 patients in each group. The experimental group (A) was assessed by using the proposed VTE risk stratification protocol and also took part in patient education programs about TKR and its complications. The control group (B) was assessed by using the 2005 Caprini risk assessment tool and no education programs were given to this group. Both groups were followed for 35 days post operation.

resultsThe mean age of the participants was 65.86 (SD 8.67) and the majority of them were female 137 (56.6%). The mean body mass index of the study sample was 32.46 (SD 5.51). There were no significant differences between the two groups except for surgery type; the proportion of bilateral TKR in group A was higher than in group B (69/121 (28.5%) vs. 40/121(16.5%), p<0.05). There were no confirmed pulmonary embolism cases in the study sample and diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis was confirmed in 12/242 (5.0%) of patients: 1/121 (0.8%) in group A and 11/121 (9.1%) in group B (p<0.05). The readmission rate for all patients was 2.5% (6/242), all of whom were in group B (p<0.05).

conclusionThe proposed VTE risk stratification protocol that was applied in conjunction with patient education programs reduced VTE complications and readmission events, post TKR surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: Identifier: NCT04031859.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyHealth CareKneeOutcome AssessmentPatient Education as TopicPatient ReadmissionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReplacementRisk AssessmentSaudi ArabiaVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID33029262
PMCPMC7523558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.