ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2020
Principal Component Analysis of the Well-Being at Work and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire (WWRRR) in the Mediterranean Region.
Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of mental health services among informal caregivers in Sardinia, Italy, during the post-pandemic crisis of the national health system: a comparative study between 2024 and 2025.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Commentary: Perceptions of care quality and human rights in Italian outpatient facilities during and after the pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Perceptions of care quality and human rights in Italian outpatient facilities during and after the pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The perception of quality of care and respect of human rights in mental healthcare facilities among users during and after the pandemic in Sardinia, Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Healthcare students are faced with the issue of the rights of people with disabilities and the quality of services: Are we training future healthcare workers who overemphasize technology?Journal of public health research · 2024Article
- Informal caregivers compared with users and health workers on well-being and respect for human rights in mental health care services.Journal of public health research · 2024Article
- Mental Health Professionals' Perception of Respect for Human Rights and Organizational Well-Being in Three Countries of South America.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Observational
- Are Nurses Working in Mental Health in a Time of Changing Approaches More Exposed to Stress than other Professionals? Job Satisfaction and Perception of Respect for the Rights of Users in Seven Different Countries Worldwide.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2024Article
- Reliability and Factor Structure of the Well-Being and Respect for Human Rights Questionnaire in Measuring Caregivers' Perception.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2024Article
- The perception of professionals and users of the quality of care and respect for human rights in four outpatient care facilities of an Italian hospital during the Covid-19 pandemic.Journal of public health research · 2022Article
- Why Was the Perception of Human Rights Respect and Care Satisfaction So High in Users of Italian Mental Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- An approach for knowledge acquisition from a survey data by conducting Bayesian network modeling, adopting the robust coplot method.Journal of applied statistics · 2022Article
- Implementing WHO-Quality Rights Project in Tunisia: Results of an Intervention at Razi Hospital.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2020Article
- Mental Health in the Mediterranean Area.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2020Article
- Staff Perception of Respect for Human Rights of Users and Organizational Well-being: A Study in Four Different Countries of the Mediterranean Area.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Well-Being at Work and Respect for human Rights Questionnaire (WWRR) was conceived based on the hypothesis that the perception of respect for users' rights is an essential element of well-being in the workplace in healthcare. The objective of the study is to examine the principal components of the WWRR.
methodsA random sample representative of a set of professionals working in three different healthcare networks in Tunisia, North-Macedonia, and Italy was enrolled (n=426). Each professional completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic data and the WWRR. The WWRR consists of six items on beliefs about: satisfaction at work, users' satisfaction, organization at work, respect of users' and staff human rights, adequacy of resources. A seventh item assesses the perceived needs of personnel. Correlation between the items was evaluated by analysing the principal components with Varimax rotation and Kaiser normalization (which included all components with an Eigen value> 1).
resultsA single factor covered over 50% of the variance, all the items of the questionnaire were closely related and compose a single factor. Tunisia presented some differences regarding the item about the human rights of staff.
conclusionSatisfaction with the respect for the rights of users is strongly correlated with the other factors that are part of the concept of the organizational well-being of health care providers. The WWRR provides a means of measuring this important and often neglected dimension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.