Observational studyNeural plasticity2020
Direct Evidence of Plasticity within Human Primary Motor and Somatosensory Cortices of Patients with Glioblastoma.
Observational study in Neural plasticity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in Somatomotor Network Connectivity Differentiate Better Versus Worse Recovery of Hand Dexterity After Brain Tumor Surgery: A Cohort Study.Neural plasticity · 2026Article
- Males but not females report genital sensations evoked by fixed-parameter stimulation of somatosensory cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Neuroplasticity in glioblastoma: there is more to plasticity than just low grade glioma.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Multimodal and Repeated Localization of Primary Hand Motor Function to the Lateral Postcentral Gyrus in a Case of Frontal Motor Area Brain Metastasis.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Central nervous system regulation of diffuse glioma growth and invasion: from single unit physiology to circuit remodeling.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Reconstruction of the Corticospinal Tract in Patients with Motor-Eloquent High-Grade Gliomas Using Multilevel Fiber Tractography Combined with Functional Motor Cortex Mapping.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Brain imaging and morphological plasticity in glioblastoma: a literature review.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Review
- Hemispheric Asymmetry of the Hand Motor Representations in Patients with Highly Malignant Brain Tumors: Implications for Surgery and Clinical Practice.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Neural Regulation of Cancer: Cancer-Induced Remodeling of the Central Nervous System.Advanced biology · 2022Review
- Neuroplasticity of Glioma Patients: Brain Structure and Topological Network.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Neuropsychological outcomes following supratotal resection for high-grade glioma: a review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Review
- What effects does awake craniotomy have on functional and survival outcomes for glioblastoma patients?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Understanding Variable Motor Responses to Direct Electrical Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex During Brain Surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating disease without cure. It is also the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Although aggressive surgical resection is standard of care, these operations are limited by tumor infiltration of critical cortical and subcortical regions. A better understanding of how the brain can recover and reorganize function in response to GBM would provide valuable clinical data. This ability, termed neuroplasticity, is not well understood in the adult human brain. A better understanding of neuroplasticity in GBM could allow for improved extent of resection, even in areas classically thought to have critical, static function. The best evidence to date has demonstrated neuroplasticity only in slower growing tumors or through indirect measures such as functional MRI or transcranial magnetic stimulation. In this novel study, we utilize a unique experimental paradigm to show direct evidence of plasticity via serial direct electrocortical stimulation (DES) within primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortices in GBM patients. Six patients with glioblastoma multiforme in or near the primary motor or somatosensory cortex were included in this retrospective observational study. These patients had two awake craniotomies with DES to map cortical motor and sensory sites in M1 and S1. Five of six patients exhibited at least one site of neuroplasticity within M1 or S1. Out of the 51 total sites stimulated, 32 (62.7%) demonstrated plasticity. Of these sites, 14 (43.7%) were in M1 and 18 (56.3%) were in S1. These data suggest that even in patients with GBM in or near primary brain regions, significant functional reorganization is possible. This is a new finding which may lead to a better understanding of the fundamental factors promoting or inhibiting plasticity. Further exploration may aid in treatment of patients with brain tumors and other neurologic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.