ArticleJournal of medical ethics2020
Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service.
Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Participation in Clinical Ethics Interventions: A Requirement of Procedural and Epistemic Justice.Bioethics · 2026Article
- The ethics of blood stewardship and quantitative futility assessments to predict certain death in neurotrauma patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Fair Healthcare Practices in Orthopedics Assessed with a New Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Doctors have an ethical obligation to ask patients about food insecurity: what is stopping us?Journal of medical ethics · 2022Article
- Gamete and embryo donation for research: what might shape the willingness to donate among gamete donors and recipients?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- The ethical challenges facing the widespread adoption of digital healthcare technology.Health and technology · 2022Article
- Ethical principles and a practical approach to support policy making through the next phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To practise 'fairly and justly' a clinician must balance the needs of both the many and the few: the individual patient in front of them, and the many unseen patients in the waiting room, and in the county. They must consider the immediate clinical needs of those in the present, and how their actions will impact on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.