Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028593›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Novel Methylated DNA Markers in the Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Recurrence.

Hao Xie, Douglas W Mahoney, Patrick H Foote, Kelli N Burger, Karen A Doering, William R Taylor, Sara S Then, Xiaoming Cao, Maria McGlinch, Calise K Berger and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05558436 (Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity Between Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05558436 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity Between Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Colorectal Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled662ConditionsColorectal TumorArmsGenome-wide methylation profiling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review: Detection of Cancer Biomarkers from a Clinical Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao XieDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9640-4055
Douglas W MahoneyDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patrick H FooteDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kelli N BurgerDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Karen A DoeringDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4769-5175
William R TaylorDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sara S ThenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Xiaoming CaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Maria McGlinchDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Calise K BergerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Tsung-Teh WuDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Joleen M HubbardDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hatim T AllawiExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.
Michael W KaiserExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.
Graham P LidgardExact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin.
David A AhlquistDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John B KisielDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. kisiel.john@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-5324
Mayo Clinic · USExact Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Multi-site Gastrointestinal Cancer Detection by Stool DNA MethylationR37CA214679 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KISIEL, JOHN · 2018 to 2024
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to assess the concordance of colorectal cancer-associated methylated DNA markers (MDM) in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer for feasibility in detection of distantly recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer in plasma. EXPERIMENTAL

designA panel of previously discovered colorectal cancer-associated MDMs was selected. MDMs from primary and paired metastatic colorectal cancer tissue were assayed with quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Plasma MDMs were measured blindly by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs in archival plasma samples from primary colorectal cancer cases. This algorithm was validated in prospectively collected plasma samples from recurrent colorectal cancer cases. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).

resultsOf the 14 selected MDMs, the concordance between primary and metastatic tissue was considered moderate or higher for 12 MDMs (86%). At a preset specificity of 95% (91%-98%), a panel of 13 MDMs, in plasma from 97 colorectal cancer cases and 200 controls, detected stage IV colorectal cancer with 100% (80%-100%) sensitivity and all stages of colorectal cancer with an AUC of 0.91 (0.87-0.95), significantly higher than carcinoembryonic antigen [AUC, 0.72 (0.65-0.79)]. This panel, in plasma from 40 cases and 60 healthy controls, detected recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer with 90% (76%-97%) sensitivity, 90% (79%-96%) specificity, and an AUC of 0.96 (0.92-1.00). The panel was positive in 0.30 (0.19-0.43) of 60 patients with no evidence of disease in post-operative patients with colorectal cancer.

conclusionsPlasma assay of novel colorectal cancer-associated MDMs can reliably detect both primary colorectal cancer and distantly recurrent colorectal cancer with promising accuracy.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveWatchful WaitingBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID33028593
PMCPMC7785570
OpenAlexW3092547406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.