Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028555›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

The efficacy and safety of varenicline alone versus in combination with nicotine lozenges for smoking cessation among hospitalised smokers (VANISH): study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Rukshar Kaizerali Gobarani, Michael J Abramson, Billie Bonevski, Gregory R Weeks, Michael J Dooley, Brian J Smith, Antony Veale, Ashley Webb, Sue Kirsa, Dennis Thomas and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Rukshar Kaizerali GobaraniCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-7887
Michael J AbramsonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Billie BonevskiSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Gregory R WeeksPharmacy Department, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Michael J DooleyCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Brian J SmithGeneral and Respiratory Medicine, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Antony VealeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia.
Ashley WebbDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Sue KirsaPharmacy Department, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Dennis ThomasPriority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, The University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Alistair MillerRespiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rudi GasserDepartment of General Medicine, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Eldho PaulSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacqueline ParkinsonPharmacy Department, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Darshana MeangerPharmacy Department, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa CowardDepartment of Anaesthesia, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Zoe KopsaftisRespiratory Medicine and Clinical Practice Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia.
Olivia RofePharmacy Department, Eastern Health Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Paula LeePharmacy Department, Eastern Health Foundation, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Johnson GeorgeCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia johnson.george@monash.edu.
Frankston Hospital · AUMonash University · AUAlfred Health · AUBarwon Health · AUEastern Health · AUMonash Health · AUQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AUBendigo Health · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmoking is a leading cause of premature deaths globally. The health benefits of smoking cessation are many. However, majority of quit attempts are unsuccessful. One way to potentially improve success rates is to evaluate new combinations of existing smoking cessation therapies that may work synergistically to decrease the intensity of withdrawal symptoms and cravings.

aimsTo evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the combination of varenicline and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) lozenges versus varenicline alone in assisting hospitalised smokers to quit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Adults with a history of smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day on average in the 4 weeks prior to their hospitalisation will be recruited. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group and will receive varenicline and NRT lozenges, or the control group and will receive varenicline and placebo lozenges. All participants will be actively referred to behavioural support from telephone Quitline. Participants are followed up at 1 and 3 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months from the start of treatment. The primary outcome is carbon monoxide validated prolonged abstinence from 2 weeks to 6 months after treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes include self-reported and biochemically validated prolonged and point prevalence abstinence at 3, 6 and 12 months, self-reported adverse events, withdrawal symptoms and cravings, adherence to treatment, Quitline sessions attended and others. According to the Russell Standard, all randomised participants will be accounted for in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, the principles of Good Clinical Practice, the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (updated 2015) and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018). Approval will be sought from the Human Ethics Committees of all the participating hospitals and the university. Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant at the time of recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001792213).

Indexed as

Smoking CessationSmoking Cessation AgentsVareniclineAdultHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmokersTobacco Use Cessation DevicesSmoking Cessation AgentsVareniclineclinical trialsprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID33028555
PMCPMC7539569
OpenAlexW3092572968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.