Trial reportBMJ open2020
Trial Of Neurostimulation In Conversion Symptoms (TONICS): a feasibility randomised controlled trial of transcranial magnetic stimulation for functional limb weakness.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measurement Properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 and Somatic Symptom Scale-8: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment outcomes in functional neurological disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the influence of symptom chronicity.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a primer for rapid improvement in functional neurological disorder: a case series.BMJ neurology open · 2025Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation-based closed-loop modality for activity of daily living gain in spinal cord injury: a retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023Observational
- Pathophysiology and Treatment of Functional Paralysis: Insight from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Functional Neurologic Disorders, disorders to be managed by neurologists, or are neurologists wandering in a dangerous field with inadequate resources?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Functional neurological disorder: new subtypes and shared mechanisms.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Neurological Patient: Scientific Principles and Applications.Seminars in neurology · 2022Article
- Functional movement disorder and functional seizures: What have we learned from different subtypes of functional neurological disorders?Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2022Review
- Neurostimulation for the treatment of functional neurological disorder: A systematic review.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2021Review
- Transcranial and muscular single-pulse magnetic stimulation is efficient on motor functional neurological disorders by the feedback of induced muscle contractions - A retrospective case series.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2021Article
- Neuromodulation Using Computer-Altered Music to Treat a Ten-Year-Old Child Unresponsive to Standard Interventions for Functional Neurological Disorder.Harvard review of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used therapeutically for functional (conversion) motor symptoms but there is limited evidence for its efficacy and the optimal protocol. We examined the feasibility of a novel randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocol of TMS to treat functional limb weakness.
designA double-blind (patient, outcome assessor) two parallel-arm, controlled RCT.
settingSpecialist neurology and neuropsychiatry services at a large National Health Service Foundation Trust in London, UK.
participantsPatients with a diagnosis of functional limb weakness (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition). Exclusion criteria included comorbid neurological or major psychiatric disorder, contraindications to TMS or previous TMS treatment.
interventionsPatients were randomised to receive either active (single-pulse TMS to primary motor cortex (M1) above resting motor threshold) or inactive treatment (single-pulse TMS to M1 below resting motor threshold). Both groups received two TMS sessions, 4 weeks apart. OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed recruitment, randomisation and retention rates. The primary outcome was patient-rated symptom change (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale, CGI-I). Secondary outcomes included clinician-rated symptom change, psychosocial functioning and disability. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, both TMS visits and at 3-month follow-up.
resultsTwenty-two patients were recruited and 21 (96%) were successfully randomised (active=10; inactive=11). Nineteen (91%) patients were included at follow-up (active=9; inactive=10). Completion rates for most outcomes were good (80%-100%). Most patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the trial in both groups, although ratings were higher in the inactive arm (active=60%, inactive=92%). Adverse events were not more common for the active treatment. Treatment effect sizes for patient-rated CGI-I scores were small-moderate (Cliff's delta=-0.1-0.3, CIs-0.79 to 0.28), reflecting a more positive outcome for the active treatment (67% and 44% of active arm-rated symptoms as 'much improved' at session 2 and follow-up, respectively, vs 20% inactive group). Effect sizes for secondary outcomes were variable.
conclusionsOur protocol is feasible. The findings suggest that supramotor threshold TMS of M1 is safe, acceptable and potentially beneficial as a treatment for functional limb weakness. A larger RCT is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN51225587.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.