Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028540›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020

Fifteen year quality of life outcomes in men with localised prostate cancer: population based Australian prospective study.

Carolyn G Mazariego, Sam Egger, Madeleine T King, Ilona Juraskova, Henry Woo, Martin Berry, Bruce K Armstrong, David P Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. World journal of urology · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn G MazariegoCancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia carolynma@nswcc.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3965-4960
Sam EggerCancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Madeleine T KingUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ilona JuraskovaUniversity of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Henry WooChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Martin BerryRiverina Cancer Centre, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Bruce K ArmstrongCancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David P SmithCancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUCalvary Riverina Hospital · AUCancer Council NSW · AUChris O’Brien Lifehouse · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess treatment related changes in quality of life up to 15 years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.

designPopulation based, prospective cohort study with follow-up over 15 years.

settingNew South Wales, Australia.

participants1642 men with localised prostate cancer, aged less than 70, and 786 controls randomly recruited from the New South Wales electoral roll into the New South Wales Prostate Cancer Care and Outcomes Study (PCOS).

main outcome measuresGeneral health and disease specific quality of life were self-reported at seven time points over a 15 year period, using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey scale, University of California, Los Angeles prostate cancer index, and expanded prostate cancer index composite short form (EPIC-26). Adjusted mean differences were calculated with controls as the comparison group. Clinical significance of adjusted mean differences was assessed by the minimally important difference, defined as one third of the standard deviation (SD) from the baseline score.

resultsAt 15 years, all treatment groups reported high levels of erectile dysfunction, depending on treatment (62.3% (active surveillance/watchful waiting, n=33/53) to 83.0% (non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, n=117/141)) compared with controls (42.7% (n=44/103)). Men who had external beam radiation therapy or high dose rate brachytherapy or androgen deprivation therapy as primary treatment reported more bowel problems. Self-reported urinary incontinence was particularly prevalent and persistent for men who underwent surgery, and an increase in urinary bother was reported in the group receiving androgen deprivation therapy from 10 to 15 years (year 10: adjusted mean difference -5.3, 95% confidence interval -10.8 to 0.2; year 15: -15.9; -25.1 to -6.7).

conclusionsPatients receiving initial active treatment for localised prostate cancer had generally worse long term self-reported quality of life than men without a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Men treated with radical prostatectomy faired especially badly, particularly in relation to long term sexual outcomes. Clinicians and patients should consider these long term quality of life outcomes when making treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsBrachytherapyLong Term Adverse EffectsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAgedAustraliaCohort StudiesErectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRisk AdjustmentAndrogen Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID33028540
PMCPMC7539021
OpenAlexW3092506186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.