Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028410›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Assessing the acoustic behaviour of Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) dsxF mutants: implications for vector control.

Matthew P Su, Marcos Georgiades, Judit Bagi, Kyros Kyrou, Andrea Crisanti, Joerg T Albert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A mosquito-inspired theoretical framework for acoustic signal detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MACSFeD-a database of mosquito acoustic communication and swarming features.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  7. Differences in maleiScience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting Sex Determination to Suppress Mosquito Populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Serotonin modulation in the maleFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew P SuEar Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK.
Marcos GeorgiadesEar Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK.
Judit BagiEar Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK.
Kyros KyrouDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andrea CrisantiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Joerg T AlbertEar Institute, University College London, 332 Grays Inn Road, London, WC1X 8EE, UK. joerg.albert@ucl.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council AV/PP/0028/1H2020 European Research Council 648709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelease of gene-drive mutants to suppress Anopheles mosquito reproduction is a promising method of malaria control. However, many scientific, regulatory and ethical questions remain before transgenic mosquitoes can be utilised in the field. At a behavioural level, gene-drive carrying mutants should be at least as sexually attractive as the wildtype populations they compete against, with a key element of Anopheles copulation being acoustic courtship. We analysed sound emissions and acoustic preference in a doublesex mutant previously used to collapse Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) cages.

methodsAnopheles rely on flight tones produced by the beating of their wings for acoustic mating communication. We assessed the impact of disrupting a female-specific isoform of the doublesex gene (dsxF) on the wing beat frequency (WBF; measured as flight tone) of males (XY) and females (XX) in homozygous dsxF

resultsA previous study showed an altered phenotype only for dsxF

conclusionsA prerequisite for anopheline copulation is the phonotactic attraction of males towards female flight tones within mating swarms. Reductions in mutant acoustic attractiveness diminish their mating efficiency and thus the efficacy of population control efforts. Caged population assessments may not successfully reproduce natural mating scenarios. We propose to amend existing testing protocols to better reflect competition between mutants and target populations. Our findings confirm that dsxF disruption has no effect on males; for some phenotypic traits, such as female WBFs, the effects of dsxF appear dose-dependent rather than haplosufficient.

Indexed as

AnophelesAcousticsAnimal CommunicationAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedFlight, AnimalGene Drive TechnologyHearingMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsMutagenesisMutationSexual Behavior, AnimalAcoustic communicationAnopheles coluzziiAnopheles gambiae (s.l.)DoublesexFlight toneGene driveHearingMosquitoPhonotaxisVector controlWing beat frequency

Identifiers

PMID33028410
PMCPMC7539510
OpenAlexW3092301938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.