Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028407›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2020

Crowdsourcing to identify social innovation initiatives in health in low- and middle-income countries.

Lindi van Niekerk, Arturo Ongkeko, Rachel Alice Hounsell, Barwani Khaura Msiska, Don Pascal Mathanga, Josselyn Mothe, Noel Juban, Phyllis Awor, Dina Balabanova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 7 countries.

Lindi van NiekerkGraduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Arturo OngkekoCollege of Medicine / National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Rachel Alice HounsellGraduate School of Business, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Barwani Khaura MsiskaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. barwanimsiska@gmail.com.
Don Pascal MathangaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Josselyn MotheCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
Noel JubanCollege of Medicine / National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Phyllis AworSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Dina BalabanovaLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Malawi · MWUniversity of the Philippines Manila · PHMakerere University · UGWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

Special Programme for Research & Training in Tropical Diseases, WHO B60110, B40119, B40175, B70104, B60107, B60108, B60109, B70084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrowdsourcing is a distributed problem-solving and production mechanism that leverages the collective intelligence of non-expert individuals and networked communities for specific goals. Social innovation (SI) initiatives aim to address health challenges in a sustainable manner, with a potential to strengthen health systems. They are developed by actors from different backgrounds and disciplines. This paper describes the application of crowdsourcing as a research method to explore SI initiatives in health.

methodsThe study explored crowdsourcing as a method to identify SI initiatives implemented in Africa, Asia and Latin America. While crowdsourcing has been used in high-income country settings, there is limited knowledge on its use, benefits and challenges in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. From 2014 to 2018, six crowdsourcing contests were conducted at global, regional and national levels.

resultsA total of 305 eligible projects were identified; of these 38 SI initiatives in health were identified. We describe the process used to perform a crowdsourcing contest for SI, the outcome of the contests, and the challenges and opportunities when using this mechanism in LMICs.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that crowdsourcing is a participatory method, that is able to identify bottom-up or grassroots SI initiatives developed by non-traditional actors.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingAfricaAsiaDeveloping CountriesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLatin AmericaOrganizational InnovationCrowdsourcingGrassroots initiativesHealthParticipatory researchSocial innovation

Identifiers

PMID33028407
PMCPMC7539476
OpenAlexW3092305920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.