Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028383›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2020

Tennis elbow, study protocol for a randomized clinical trial: needling with and without platelet-rich plasma after failure of up-to-date rehabilitation.

A J Schwitzguebel, M Bogoev, V Nikolov, F Ichane, A Lädermann

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03987256 (Tennis Elbow, Randomized Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03987256 naunknown statusnot on this map

Tennis Elbow, Randomized Study: Needling With and Without Platelet-rich Plasma After Failure of Up-to-date Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdrien SchwitzguebelRan2020 to 2022Enrolled58ConditionsTennis Elbow, PRP, Tendinopathy, TendinosisArmsInitial rehabilitation protocol, Needling with PRP, Needling with saline solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A J SchwitzguebelSports Medicine Division, La Providence Hospital, Fbg de l'Hopital 81, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. adrien.schwitzguebel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8212-1812
M BogoevGiant Studio, Rue des Noyers 2, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
V NikolovGiant Studio, Rue des Noyers 2, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
F IchaneService Médecine interne, Groupe Hospitalier Est Reunion, 30 rte Nationale 3 - ZAC Madeleine, 186 97470, Saint Benoît, BP, France.
A LädermannDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Rue J.-D. Maillard 3, 1217, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FRHôpital de la Providence · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe conservative management of lateral epicondylitis is known to be a difficult-to-treat annoying condition. A treatment with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is often performed, but its efficacy remains controversial.

methodsThis study is a single-center, randomized double-blind controlled trial, preceded by a case series. All the 232 planned patients of the case series will undergo an up-to-date comprehensive rehabilitation program, including focused extracorporeal shock waves therapy. This rehabilitation program is expected to have a maximum success rate 75%. It is therefore aimed to allocate a minimum of 58 patients with rehabilitation failure into the 1:1 randomized trial. Stratification is planned on age and lesion pattern. The masking will be quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator & Outcome Assessor). The patients will undergo an ultrasound (US)-guided needling combined with either PRP (intervention group) or saline (control group). The primary endpoint will be the pain improvement from baseline (month 0) at 3 months on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) during a maximal strength isometric contraction of the extensor carpialis brevis muscle. The main secondary endpoints will include the rehabilitation success rate and improvements from baseline at 3, 6, and 12 months of the following outcomes: (i) Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, (ii) Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score, (iii) maximal grip strength on Jamar test, and (iv) the ultrasonographic evaluation of the US of the epicondylar tendons. DISCUSSION: The study results will provide insight into the effect of PRP as adjuvant therapy to tendon fenestration, and may contribute to identify the best preceding and concomitant rehabilitation protocol.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03987256. Registered on 20 August 2019.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodDry NeedlingExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTennis ElbowTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalClinical protocolsDouble-blind methodExtracorporeal shock waves therapyInterventionalPlatelet-rich plasmaRandomizedRehabilitationResearch designTendinopathyTennis ElbowUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID33028383
PMCPMC7542691
OpenAlexW3092424329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.