Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028256›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2020

Modelling the lifetime cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active monitoring for men with clinically localised prostate cancer from median 10-year outcomes in the ProtecT randomised trial.

S Sanghera, S Mohiuddin, J Coast, K Garfield, S Noble, C Metcalfe, J A Lane, E L Turner, D Neal, F C Hamdy and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02044172 (The ProtecT Trial - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatments for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02044172 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The ProtecT Trial - Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatments for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2001 to 2027Enrolled82,849ConditionsProstate CancerArmsRadical prostatectomy, Conformal radiation therapy, Active monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of exercise during active surveillance for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S SangheraHealth Economics Bristol (HEB), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK. Sabina.Sanghera@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-3103
S MohiuddinHealth Economics Bristol (HEB), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
J CoastHealth Economics Bristol (HEB), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
K GarfieldHealth Economics Bristol (HEB), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
S NobleHealth Economics Bristol (HEB), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1NU, UK.
C MetcalfeBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
J A LaneBristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
E L TurnerPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
D NealNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
F C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
R M MartinPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
J L DonovanNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
ProtecT study group
University of Bristol · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBAt Bristol · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15064Cancer Research UK 24432Cancer Research UK C11043/A4286, C18281/A8145, C18281/A11326, C18281/A15064, and C18281/A24432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal management strategies for clinically localised prostate cancer are debated. Using median 10-year data from the largest randomised controlled trial to date (ProtecT), the lifetime cost-effectiveness of three major treatments (radical radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy and active monitoring) was explored according to age and risk subgroups.

methodsA decision-analytic (Markov) model was developed and informed by clinical input. The economic evaluation adopted a UK NHS perspective and the outcome was cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained (reported in UK£), estimated using EQ-5D-3L.

resultsCosts and QALYs extrapolated over the lifetime were mostly similar between the three randomised strategies and their subgroups, but with some important differences. Across all analyses, active monitoring was associated with higher costs, probably associated with higher rates of metastatic disease and changes to radical treatments. When comparing the value of the strategies (QALY gains and costs) in monetary terms, for both low-risk prostate cancer subgroups, radiotherapy generated the greatest net monetary benefit (£293,446 [95% CI £282,811 to £299,451] by D'Amico and £292,736 [95% CI £284,074 to £297,719] by Grade group 1). However, the sensitivity analysis highlighted uncertainty in the finding when stratified by Grade group, as radiotherapy had 53% probability of cost-effectiveness and prostatectomy had 43%. In intermediate/high risk groups, using D'Amico and Grade group > = 2, prostatectomy generated the greatest net monetary benefit (£275,977 [95% CI £258,630 to £285,474] by D'Amico and £271,933 [95% CI £237,864 to £287,784] by Grade group). This finding was supported by the sensitivity analysis. Prostatectomy had the greatest net benefit (£290,487 [95% CI £280,781 to £296,281]) for men younger than 65 and radical radiotherapy (£201,311 [95% CI £195,161 to £205,049]) for men older than 65, but sensitivity analysis showed considerable uncertainty in both findings.

conclusionOver the lifetime, extrapolating from the ProtecT trial, radical radiotherapy and prostatectomy appeared to be cost-effective for low risk prostate cancer, and radical prostatectomy for intermediate/high risk prostate cancer, but there was uncertainty in some estimates. Longer ProtecT trial follow-up is required to reduce uncertainty in the model.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297: http://isrctn.org (14/10/2002); ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (23/01/2014).

Indexed as

AgedClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMaleProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsTime FactorsActive monitoringLifetime cost-effectivenessProstate cancerProstatectomyProtecT trialRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33028256
PMCPMC7542698
OpenAlexW3092237885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.