Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33028058›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental emergency medicine2020

Usefulness of ischemia-modified albumin in the diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the emergency department.

Seung Hwa Choo, Yong Su Lim, Jin Seong Cho, Jae Ho Jang, Jea Yeon Choi, Woo Sung Choi, Hyuk Jun Yang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05286268 (The Role of Ischemia Modified Albumin in Patients With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05286268 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Ischemia Modified Albumin in Patients With COVID-19

TypeobservationalSponsorLarissa University HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled194ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsIschemia Modified Albumin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seung Hwa ChooDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Yong Su LimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Jin Seong ChoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Jae Ho JangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Jea Yeon ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Woo Sung ChoiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Hyuk Jun YangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Gachon University Gil Medical Center · KRGachon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNo studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) for the early detection of sepsis/septic shock in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). We aimed to assess the usefulness of IMA in diagnosing sepsis/septic shock in the ED.

methodsThis retrospective, observational study analyzed IMA, lactate, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin levels measured within 1 hour of ED arrival. Patients with suspected infection meeting at least two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were included and classified into the infection, sepsis, and septic shock groups using Sepsis-3 definitions. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine diagnostic performance.

resultsThis study included 300 adult patients. The AUC (95% CI) of IMA levels (cut-off ≥85.5 U/mL vs. ≥87.5 U/mL) was higher for the diagnosis of sepsis than for that of septic shock (0.729 [0.667-0.791] vs. 0.681 [0.613-0.824]) and was higher than the AUC of procalcitonin levels (cut-off ≥1.58 ng/mL, 0.678 [0.613-0.742]) for the diagnosis of sepsis. When IMA and lactate levels were combined, the AUCs were 0.815 (0.762-0.867) and 0.806 (0.754-0.858) for the diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock, respectively. IMA levels independently predicted sepsis (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.09; P=0.029) and septic shock (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P=0.002).

conclusionOur findings indicate that IMA levels are a useful biomarker for diagnosing sepsis/septic shock early, and their combination with lactate levels can enhance the predictive power for early diagnosis of sepsis/septic shock in the ED.

Indexed as

BiomarkersIschemia-modified albuminSepsisShock, septic

Identifiers

PMID33028058
PMCPMC7550814
OpenAlexW3090755981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.