Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33027989›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Treated Nonoperatively Using Figure-of-Eight Bandage: Are Fracture Type, Shortening, and Displacement Radiographic Predictors of Failure?

Jacopo Tagliapietra, Elisa Belluzzi, Carlo Biz, Andrea Angelini, Ilaria Fantoni, Manuela Scioni, Mario Bolzan, Antonio Berizzi, Pietro Ruggieri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacopo TagliapietraOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Elisa BelluzziOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-2574
Carlo BizOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8517-0057
Andrea AngeliniOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Ilaria FantoniOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Manuela ScioniDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Mario BolzanDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.
Antonio BerizziOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Pietro RuggieriOrthopaedic Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DiSCOG, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-9882
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As there are no clear and unique radiographic predictors of healing disturbances for acute midshaft clavicle fractures, their treatment is still controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate in midshaft clavicle fractures treated nonoperatively if fracture type (FT), shortening, and displacement, assessed before and after figure-of-eight bandage (F8-B) application, could be considered prognostic factors of delayed union and nonunion. One hundred twenty-two adult patients presenting a closed displaced midshaft clavicle fracture, managed nonoperatively with an F8-B, were enrolled. FT, initial shortening (IS), and initial displacement (ID) were radiographically evaluated at diagnosis, and both residual shortening (RS) and displacement (RD) were measured after F8-B application. The patients were followed up 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Multivariate statistical analysis was performed. RD should be considered as radiological predictor of sequelae. Further, an RD equal to 104% of clavicle width was identified as an optimal cut-off point to distinguish between healed and unhealed fractures, and 140% between delayed union and nonunion. Our data pointed out the effectiveness of the F8-B in reducing fracture fragments and restoring clavicular length. In midshaft clavicle fractures of adults, fracture comminution and clavicular shortening did not influence bone healing. On the contrary, RD has been shown as the most likely predictor of both delayed union and nonunion.

Indexed as

figure-of-eight bandagemidshaft clavicle fracturesshortening and displacement

Identifiers

PMID33027989
PMCPMC7599597
OpenAlexW3091820255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.