ArticleCancer medicine2020
Comparison of breast cancer prognostic tests CanAssist Breast and Oncotype DX.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world data of CanAssist Breast- first immunohistochemistry and AI-based prognostic test.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Performance of a novel spectroscopy-based tool for adjuvant therapy decision-making in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a validation study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Identification of Patients with Early HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024Article
- Article
- Ten-year distant-recurrence risk prediction in breast cancer by CanAssist Breast (CAB) in Dutch sub-cohort of the randomized TEAM trial.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Article
- A comparative analysis of recurrence risk predictions in ER+/HER2- early breast cancer using NHS Nottingham Prognostic Index, PREDICT, and CanAssist Breast.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Practical Consensus Recommendations for Optimizing Risk versus Benefit of Chemotherapy in Patients with HR Positive Her2 Negative Early Breast Cancer in India.South Asian journal of cancer · 2021Article
- Comparison of breast cancer prognostic tests CanAssist Breast and Oncotype DX.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCanAssist Breast (CAB) is a prognostic test for early stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer patients, validated on Indian and Caucasian patients. The 21-gene signature Oncotype DX (ODX) is the most widely used commercially available breast cancer prognostic test. In the current study, risk stratification of CAB is compared with that done with ODX along with the respective outcomes of these patients.
methodsA cohort of 109 early stage breast cancer patients who had previously taken the ODX test were retested with CAB, and the results respectively compared with old cut-offs of ODX as well as cut-offs suggested by TAILORx, a prospective randomized trial of ODX. Distant metastasis-free survival after 5 years was taken as the end point.
resultsCanAssist Breast stratified 83.5% of the cohort into low-risk and 16.5% into high-risk. With the TAILORx cut-offs, ODX stratified the cohort into 89.9% low-risk and 10.1% into high-risk. The low, intermediate, and high-risk groups with ODX old cut-offs were 62.4%, 31.2%, and 6.4%, respectively. The overall concordance of CAB with ODX using both cut-offs is 75%-76%, with ~82%-83% concordance in the low-risk category of these tests. The NPV of the low-risk category of CAB was 93.4%, and of ODX with TAILORx cut-offs was 91.8% and 89.7% with old cut-offs.
conclusionsCompared to the concordance reported for other tests, CAB shows high concordance with ODX, and in addition shows comparable performance in the patient outcomes in this cohort. CAB is thus an excellent and cost-effective alternative to ODX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.