Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33027405›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020

Development and validation of an interactive educational technology on spotted fever.

Gabriela Rodrigues Bragagnollo, Rosangela Andrade Aukar de Camargo, Marcela das Neves Guimarães, Tâmyssa Simões Dos Santos, Estela Leite Meirelles Monteiro, Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriela Rodrigues BragagnolloORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-8046
Rosangela Andrade Aukar de CamargoORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4872-2331
Marcela das Neves GuimarãesORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-0119
Estela Leite Meirelles MonteiroORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-0133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto develop and validate an interactive educational technology on spotted fever, to offer an innovative teaching method.

methoda methodological study that covered the following stages: analysis and diagnosis; instructional planning, didactic design, review, and validation and production of technology.

resultsthe analysis and diagnosis were obtained from experiences in education and health activities for spotted fever. In the instructional planning, it was defined that the technology would be presented in the form of an Interactive Laboratory, with learning stations. The production of the Laboratory was carried out by a multidisciplinary team made up of a carpenter, an electrician, and a plastic artist, among others. The review and validation process was subdivided into two stages: appearance and content validation by professionals in the fields of biology, and education and semantic validation by students of the Nursing and Pedagogy courses. The results of the appearance and content validation showed a content validity index over 0.8 for the vast majority of the variables. In the semantic validation, the Laboratory was evaluated positively by the students.

conclusionthe trajectory followed for the construction of the Interactive Laboratory on spotted fever gave academic and scientific support to the product, offering an innovative educational resource with pedagogical potential that values significant learning.

Indexed as

Educational TechnologySpotted Fever Group RickettsiosisHumansLearningSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33027405
PMCPMC7529451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.