Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33027304›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The SRG rat, a Sprague-Dawley Rag2/Il2rg double-knockout validated for human tumor oncology studies.

Fallon K Noto, Jaya Sangodkar, Bisoye Towobola Adedeji, Sam Moody, Christopher B McClain, Ming Tong, Eric Ostertag, Jack Crawford, Xiaohua Gao, Lauren Hurst and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Rat Models of Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Metastasis from the tumor interior and necrotic core formation are regulated by breast cancer-derived angiopoietin-like 7.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Fallon K NotoHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Jaya SangodkarDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Bisoye Towobola AdedejiHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Sam MoodyHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Christopher B McClainHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Ming TongPoseida Therapeutics Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Eric OstertagPoseida Therapeutics Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.
Jack CrawfordHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Xiaohua GaoDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Lauren HurstDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Caitlin M O'ConnorDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Erika N HansonDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5952-0962
Sudeh IzadmehrDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
Rita TohméCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Jyothsna NarlaRegional Medical Center, San Jose, California, United States of America.
Kristin LeSueurDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Kajari BhattacharyaDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Amit RupaniDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Marwan K TayehDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Jeffrey W InnisDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Matthew D GalskyDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America.
B Mark EversMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Analisa DiFeoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Goutham NarlaHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
Tseten Y JamlingHera BioLabs Inc., Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America.
University of Michigan · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USPoseida Therapeutics (United States) · USCase Western Reserve University · USRegional Medical Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Training Program in Tumor MicroenvironmentT32CA009676 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Maria G Castro, Analisa Virginia DiFeo · 1992 to 2026
$7.3M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201700017CNCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have created the immunodeficient SRG rat, a Sprague-Dawley Rag2/Il2rg double knockout that lacks mature B cells, T cells, and circulating NK cells. This model has been tested and validated for use in oncology (SRG OncoRat®). The SRG rat demonstrates efficient tumor take rates and growth kinetics with different human cancer cell lines and PDXs. Although multiple immunodeficient rodent strains are available, some important human cancer cell lines exhibit poor tumor growth and high variability in those models. The VCaP prostate cancer model is one such cell line that engrafts unreliably and grows irregularly in existing models but displays over 90% engraftment rate in the SRG rat with uniform growth kinetics. Since rats can support much larger tumors than mice, the SRG rat is an attractive host for PDX establishment. Surgically resected NSCLC tissue from nine patients were implanted in SRG rats, seven of which engrafted and grew for an overall success rate of 78%. These developed into a large tumor volume, over 20,000 mm3 in the first passage, which would provide an ample source of tissue for characterization and/or subsequent passage into NSG mice for drug efficacy studies. Molecular characterization and histological analyses were performed for three PDX lines and showed high concordance between passages 1, 2 and 3 (P1, P2, P3), and the original patient sample. Our data suggest the SRG OncoRat is a valuable tool for establishing PDX banks and thus serves as an alternative to current PDX mouse models hindered by low engraftment rates, slow tumor growth kinetics, and multiple passages to develop adequate tissue banks.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorGene DeletionHumansInterleukin Receptor Common gamma SubunitLung NeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysInterleukin Receptor Common gamma Subunit

Identifiers

PMID33027304
PMCPMC7540894
OpenAlexW3092415416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.