ArticlePloS one2020
The data dimensionality reduction and bad data detection in the process of smart grid reconstruction through machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-05Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To detect false data injection attacks (FDIAs) in power grid reconstruction and solve the problem of high data dimension and bad abnormal data processing in the power system, thereby achieving safe and stable operation of the power grid system, this study introduces machine learning methods to explore the detection of FDIAs. First, through the utilization of the standard IEEE node system and the simulation of FDIAs under the condition of non-complete topology information, the construction of the attack data set is completed, and the MatPower tool is applied to simulate and analyze the data set. Second, based on the isolated Forest (iForest) abnormal score data processing algorithm combined with the Local Linear Embedding (LLE) data dimensionality reduction method, an algorithm for data feature extraction is constructed. Finally, based on the combination of the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) network, an algorithm model for FDIAs detection is constructed. The results show that in the IEEE14-bus node and IEEE118-bus node systems, the overall distribution of the state estimated before and after the attack vector injection is consistent with the initial value. In the iFores algorithm, the number of iTree and the number of samples affect the extraction of abnormal score data. When the number of iTree n is determined to be 100, and the corresponding number of samples w is determined to be 10, the algorithm has the best detection effect. The FDIAs detection algorithm model based on CNN-GRU shows good detection effects under high attack intensity, with an accuracy rate of more than 95%, and its performance is better than other traditional detection algorithms. In this study, the bad data detection model based on deep learning has an active role in the realization of the safe and stable operation of the smart grid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.