Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33027291›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Development of a scalable and extendable multi-dimensional health index to measure the health of individuals.

Chun Wei Yap, Lixia Ge, Reuben Ong, Ruijie Li, Bee Hoon Heng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Monitoring and evaluation instruments of individual health in community settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Psychometric Properties of the Patient Activation Measure in Community-Dwelling Adults in Singapore.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chun Wei YapHealth Services & Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-3492
Lixia GeHealth Services & Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.
Reuben OngHealth Services & Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.
Ruijie LiHealth Services & Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.
Bee Hoon HengHealth Services & Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor population health management, it is important to have health indices that can monitor prevailing health trends in the population. Traditional health indices are generally measurable at different geographical levels with varied number of health dimensions. The aim of this work was to develop and validate a scalable and extendable multi-dimensional health index based on individual data.

methodsWe defined health to be made up of five different domains: Physical, Mental, Social, Risk, and Healthcare utilization. Item response theory was used to develop models to compute domain scores and a health index. These were normalized to represent an individual's health percentile relative to the population (0 = worst health, 100 = best health). Data for the models came from a longitudinal health survey on 1,942 participants. The health index was validated using age, frailty, post-survey one-year healthcare utilization and one-year mortality.

resultsThe Spearman rho between the health index and age, frailty and post-survey one-year healthcare utilization were -0.571, -0.561 and -0.435, respectively, with all p<0.001. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) for post-survey one-year mortality was 0.930. An advantage of the health index is that it can be calculated using different sets of questions and the number of questions can be easily expanded.

conclusionThe health index can be used at the individual, program, local, regional or national level to track the state of health of the population. When used together with the domain scores, it can identify regions with poor health and deficiencies within each of the five health domains.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33027291
PMCPMC7540893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.