Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026958›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020

Adaptive weighting of taste and odor cues during flavor choice.

Joost X Maier, Victoria E Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cortical Hub for Flavor Sensation in Rodents.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joost X MaierDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Victoria E ElliottDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0405-3866

Funding

Multisensory mechanisms underlying flavor preference formationR01DC016063 · NIDCD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAIER, JOOST · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016063NIH NIDCD DC016063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colloquially referred to as "taste," flavor is in reality a thoroughly multisensory experience. Yet, a mechanistic understanding of the multisensory computations underlying flavor perception and food choice is lacking. Here, we used a multisensory flavor choice task in rats to test specific predictions of the statistically optimal integration framework, which has previously yielded much insight into cue integration in other multisensory systems. Our results confirm three key predictions of this framework in the unique context of flavor choice behavior, providing novel mechanistic insight into multisensory flavor processing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorCuesFemaleFood PreferencesLikelihood FunctionsMaleOlfactory PerceptionRatsRats, Long-EvansTaste Perceptioncross-modalcue combinationmaximum likelihood estimationmultisensorypreference

Identifiers

PMID33026958
PMCPMC7814898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.