Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026713›Full record

Observational studyArthritis care & research2021

Addressing Health Literacy Needs in Rheumatology: Which Patient Health Literacy Profiles Need the Attention of Health Professionals?

Mark M Bakker, Polina Putrik, Jany Rademakers, Mart van de Laar, Harald Vonkeman, Marc R Kok, Hanneke Voorneveld-Nieuwenhuis, Sofia Ramiro, Maarten de Wit, Rachelle Buchbinder and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis care & research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mark M BakkerMaastricht UMC+ and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8972-1300
Polina PutrikMaastricht UMC+ and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9342-1861
Jany RademakersNivel Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mart van de LaarMedisch Spectrum Twente, Arthritis Center Twente and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Harald VonkemanMedisch Spectrum Twente, Arthritis Center Twente and University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3792-7718
Marc R KokMaasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-6926
Hanneke Voorneveld-NieuwenhuisMaasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sofia RamiroLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, and Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8899-9087
Maarten de WitTools2use patient association, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-6354
Rachelle BuchbinderMonash University and Cabrini Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-0933
Roy BatterhamSwinburne University of Technology, Centre for Global Health and Equity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, and Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-1011
Richard H OsborneSwinburne University of Technology, Centre for Global Health and Equity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9081-2699
Annelies BoonenMaastricht UMC+ and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0682-9533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify and describe health literacy profiles of patients with rheumatic diseases and explore whether the identified health literacy profiles can be generalized to a broader rheumatology context.

methodsPatients with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and gout from 3 hospitals in different regions in The Netherlands completed the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify patients' health literacy profiles based on 9 HLQ domains. A multinomial regression model with the identified health literacy profiles as the dependent variable was fitted to assess whether patients with a given disease type or attending a given hospital were more likely to belong to a specific profile.

resultsAmong 895 participating patients, the lowest mean HLQ domain scores (indicating most difficulty) were found for "critical appraisal," "navigating the health system," and "finding good health information." The 10 identified profiles revealed substantial diversity in combinations of strengths and weaknesses. While 42% of patients scored moderate to high on all 9 domains (profiles 1 and 3), another 42% of patients (profiles 2, 4, 5, and 6) clearly struggled with 1 or several aspects of health literacy. Notably, 16% (profiles 7-10) exhibited difficulty across a majority of health literacy domains. The probability of belonging to one of the profiles was independent of the hospital where the patient was treated or the type of rheumatic disease.

conclusionTen distinct health literacy profiles were identified among patients with rheumatic diseases, independent of disease type and treating hospital. These profiles can be used to facilitate the development of health literacy interventions in rheumatology.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidGoutHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicSpondylarthritisAccess to InformationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth CommunicationHealth LiteracyHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID33026713
PMCPMC7839720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.