Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026690›Full record

ArticleAndrologia2020

Hypotonic challenge reduces human sperm motility through coiling and folding of the tail.

Emma Holmes, Lars Björndahl, Ulrik Kvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Andrologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ESHRE recommendations on Good Practice in the IVF laboratory†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma HolmesANOVA, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6619-515X
Lars BjörndahlANOVA, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4709-5807
Ulrik KvistANOVA, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Nidacon International AB
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human ejaculates collected for in vitro procedures show variably rapid increases in osmolality, depending on enzymatic degradation of compounds. Changes in osmolality can affect cell functions due to the energy consuming processes needed to control cell volume. The aim was to examine the effects of a hypotonic challenge for spermatozoa exposed to increased osmolality. Spermatozoa were selected by density gradient centrifugation and washed in media with different osmolalities. Osmolality was measured by freezing-point depression and sperm velocities by CASA. Swimming pattern observations and assessments of tail morphology of fixed spermatozoa were done with phase contrast microscopy. Increased osmolality did not change the curvilinear velocity (VCL), while decreased osmolality reduced or abolished VCL nonreversibly. For spermatozoa first exposed to 400 mOsm/kg, reversal of osmolality to 290 mOsm/kg reduced the VCL and the average path velocity (VAP) permanently. Hypotonic challenges increased sperm tail coiling and folding in a dose-response pattern. Spermatozoa once adjusted to high osmolality in the liquefied ejaculate are likely to suffer if exposed to a medium with a lower osmolality. For improved success of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), it appears to be important to minimise the duration of sperm exposure to the ejaculate, by early dilution or sperm preparation.

Indexed as

SpermatozoaSperm MotilityHumansMaleOsmolar ConcentrationSperm Tailsemen osmolalitysperm motilitysperm preparationsperm tail coilingsperm tail folding

Identifiers

PMID33026690
PMCPMC7757238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.