ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021
[DMEK in complicated cases of bullous keratopathy after multiple intraocular surgeries].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Corneal transplant survival rate in glaucoma patients with multiple previous antiglaucoma surgeries.International ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the last decade Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has been established as a surgical treatment even for complex cases of bullous keratopathy. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn a case series 9 eyes from 8 patients with chronic corneal edema caused by multiple intraocular operations underwent DMEK surgery. It was the sole surgical procedure in three eyes. In one case DMEK was combined with an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, with opacified intraocular lens exchange in a second case, with transscleral cyclophotocoagulation with Iridex micropulse laser (Iridex, Silicon Valley, CA, USA) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in a third case and with the Tutopatch® (DMR srl, Italy) coverage of a scleral perforation in a fourth case. Additionally, DMEK was combined with trimming of the Ahmed valve tube length in two cases. The follow-up period was 12 months.
resultsOut of 9 eyes 2 showed a persistent partial or total detachment of the graft with concomitant recurrence of bullous keratopathy despite repeated injection of 20% sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in the anterior chamber. These 2 eyes were treated with penetrating keratoplasty and achieved satisfactory postoperative results including pain relief. Visual acuity did not improve in these 2 eyes due to optic atrophy. Visual acuity and pain improved in the first postoperative month in 7 eyes. Donor endothelial cell density decreased from 2465±147/mm
conclusionAlthough DMEK is a technically demanding surgical treatment for complicated cases of severe bullous keratopathy, it provides satisfactory results in terms of the improvement of visual acuity, pain relief and a shorter postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.