Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026476›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Evaluation of short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 80 years old: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Toshinori Sueda, Mitsuyoshi Tei, Kentaro Nishida, Yukihiro Yoshikawa, Tae Matsumura, Chikato Koga, Masaki Wakasugi, Hiromichi Miyagaki, Ryohei Kawabata, Masanori Tsujie and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshinori SuedaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan. sueda811@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-7458
Mitsuyoshi TeiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Kentaro NishidaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Yukihiro YoshikawaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Tae MatsumuraDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Chikato KogaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Masaki WakasugiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Hiromichi MiyagakiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Ryohei KawabataDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Masanori TsujieDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Junichi HasegawaDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-kitaku, Sakai, Osaka, 591-8025, Japan.
Osaka Rosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt remains controversial whether the advantages of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are beneficial in elderly patients (EP, age ≥ 80 years). The present study aimed to evaluate whether age itself is an independent risk factor for laparoscopic surgery by comparing short- and long-term outcomes between non-EP and EP groups.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 730 consecutive patients with stage I-III CRC who had undergone elective surgery between 2010 and 2017, using propensity score-matched analysis.

resultsMedian follow-up was 49 months. After matching, we enrolled 228 patients. In the matched cohort, estimated operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node dissection ≥ D3, number of lymph nodes harvested < 12, conversion rate, multivisceral resection rate, postoperative complication rate, and length of postsurgical stay were similar between the two groups. Before matching, compared with the non-EP group, the EP group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.01), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.01), and higher frequency of local recurrence (LR) (p = 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in terms of incidence of LR or CSS between the two groups in the matched cohort. Prior to matching, multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 80 years as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.01), CSS (p < 0.01), and RFS (p = 0.01); however, after matching, age ≥ 80 years was not an independent poor prognostic factor for OS or CCS.

conclusionsLaparoscopic surgery offers a safe, effective option for CRC in EP aged ≥ 80 years.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyAgedAged, 80 and overHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancerElderlyLaparoscopic surgeryOncological outcomesPropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID33026476
OpenAlexW3092197347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.