Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026474›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2021

Esophageal Lipoma and Liposarcoma: A Systematic Review.

Davide Ferrari, Daniele Bernardi, Stefano Siboni, Veronica Lazzari, Emanuele Asti, Luigi Bonavina

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors.Innovative surgical sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effective Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of a Huge Esophageal Liposarcoma: A Case Report.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Esophageal Liposarcoma: A rare tumor.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Davide FerrariDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, University of Milan, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-5011
Daniele BernardiDivision of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, San Donato Milanese, 20097, Milan, Italy.
Stefano SiboniDivision of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, San Donato Milanese, 20097, Milan, Italy.
Veronica LazzariDivision of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, San Donato Milanese, 20097, Milan, Italy.
Emanuele AstiDivision of General and Foregut Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, San Donato Milanese, 20097, Milan, Italy.
Luigi BonavinaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, University of Milan, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, 20133, Milan, Italy. luigi.bonavina@unimi.it.
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal lipomatous tumors, also reported as fibrovascular polyp, fibrolipoma, angiolipoma, and liposarcoma, account for less than 1% of all benign mesenchymal submucosal tumors of the esophagus. Clinical presentation and therapy may differ based on location, size, and morphology. A comprehensive and updated systematic review of the literature is lacking.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Medline databases were consulted using MESH keywords. Non-English written articles and abstracts were excluded. Sex, age, symptoms at presentation, diagnosis, tumor location and size, surgical approach and technique of excision, pathology, and morphology were extracted and recorded in an electronic database.

resultsSixty-seven studies for a total of 239 patients with esophageal lipoma or liposarcoma were included in the qualitative analysis. Among 176 patients with benign lipoma, the median age was 55. The main symptoms were dysphagia (64.2%), transoral polyp regurgitation (32.4%), and globus sensation (22.7%). The majority of lipomas (85.7%) were intraluminal polyps, with a stalk originating from the upper esophagus. Overall, 165 patients underwent excision of the mass through open surgery (65.5%), endoscopy (27.9%), or laparoscopy/thoracoscopy (3.6%). Only 5 (3%) of patients required esophagectomy. Of the 11 untreated patients with an intraluminal polyp, 7 died from asphyxia. Overall, liposarcoma was diagnosed in 63 patients, and 12 (19%) underwent esophagectomy.

conclusionEsophageal lipomatous tumors are rare but potentially lethal when are intraluminal and originate from the cervical esophagus. Modern radiological imaging has improved diagnostic accuracy. Minimally invasive transoral and laparoscopic/thoracoscopic techniques represent the therapeutic approach of choice.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsLipomaEsophagectomyHumansLiposarcoma

Identifiers

PMID33026474
PMCPMC7752877
OpenAlexW3092570680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.