Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026449›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Icotinib With Concurrent Radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy Alone in Older Adults With Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Honglei Luo, Wei Jiang, Li Ma, Peng Chen, Min Fang, Lingyu Ding, Yuhui Hua, Dexi Du, Zhao Jing, Ruifei Xie and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02375581 (A Phase II Study of Icotinib With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02375581 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Phase II Study of Icotinib With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst People's Hospital of HangzhouRan2015 to 2018Enrolled130ConditionsEsophageal CancerArmsIcotinib, Thoracic radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Approach to Localized Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Honglei LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Li MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Peng ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Min FangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lingyu DingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhui HuaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Dexi DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Zhao JingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Ruifei XieDepartment of Bio-informatics, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yaqi SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, China.
Jiayang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, China.
Rongjing ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhifeng TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lishui Central Hospital, Lishui, China.
Shixiu WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Hangzhou Cancer Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNLishui Central Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNHuaian First People’s Hospital · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is generally recommended for older patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with poor prognosis. A new combination treatment is therefore needed. Objective: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of RT plus icotinib vs RT alone in older patients with ESCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted in China, with enrollment between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2016. Patients aged 70 years or older with clinical stage T2 to T4, N0/1, M0/1a unresectable (because of comorbidities, T4 disease, unresectable lymph node, or refused surgery) ESCC were randomized 1:1 to receive RT plus icotinib or RT alone. Radiation was prescribed at 60 Gy in 30 fractions in both groups, and icotinib was administered at a dosage of 125 mg 3 times a day in the RT plus icotinib group. The last follow-up was completed on June 30, 2019, and data were analyzed from July 1 to September 30, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to either RT plus icotinib or RT alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Treatment-related toxic effects were evaluated. Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression if available. Results: A total of 127 patients (median age, 76 years [range, 70-91 years]; 76 men [59.8%]) were enrolled and were eligible for survival analysis. Median OS was 24.0 (95% CI, 22.2-25.8) months in the RT plus icotinib group vs 16.3 (95% CI, 13.8-18.8) months in the RT group (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.87; P = .008). No difference was observed in grades 3 or 4 adverse events. Patients with EGFR overexpression had a significantly better median overall survival (not reached vs 16.3 months [range, 2.6-45.1 months]; P = .03) in the RT plus icotinib group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, icotinib plus RT was well tolerated and improved OS in older patients with ESCC relative to RT alone. Patients with EGFR overexpression benefitted more from icotinib with RT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02375581.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapyCombined Modality TherapyCrown EthersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingQuinazolinesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsCrown EthersicotinibQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID33026449
PMCPMC7542309
OpenAlexW3091992735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.