Trial reportJAMA network open2020
Icotinib With Concurrent Radiotherapy vs Radiotherapy Alone in Older Adults With Unresectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02375581 (A Phase II Study of Icotinib With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Study of Icotinib With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status and perspectives of esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Case report: Efficacy of icotinib treatment in lung adenocarcinoma with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a rare case of double primary malignant tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance and radiosensitization strategies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- The Molecular Characterization of Genetic Abnormalities in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma May Foster the Development of Targeted Therapies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting survival of nonoperative EGFR-positive locally advanced elderly esophageal cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- The roles and mechanisms of the lncRNA-miRNA axis in the progression of esophageal cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Review
- Approach to Localized Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Review
- Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: New opportunities towards molecularly targeted therapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2022Review
- Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Elderly Patients With Potentially Curable Esophageal Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is generally recommended for older patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with poor prognosis. A new combination treatment is therefore needed. Objective: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of RT plus icotinib vs RT alone in older patients with ESCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted in China, with enrollment between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2016. Patients aged 70 years or older with clinical stage T2 to T4, N0/1, M0/1a unresectable (because of comorbidities, T4 disease, unresectable lymph node, or refused surgery) ESCC were randomized 1:1 to receive RT plus icotinib or RT alone. Radiation was prescribed at 60 Gy in 30 fractions in both groups, and icotinib was administered at a dosage of 125 mg 3 times a day in the RT plus icotinib group. The last follow-up was completed on June 30, 2019, and data were analyzed from July 1 to September 30, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to either RT plus icotinib or RT alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Treatment-related toxic effects were evaluated. Immunohistochemistry was performed to analyze epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression if available. Results: A total of 127 patients (median age, 76 years [range, 70-91 years]; 76 men [59.8%]) were enrolled and were eligible for survival analysis. Median OS was 24.0 (95% CI, 22.2-25.8) months in the RT plus icotinib group vs 16.3 (95% CI, 13.8-18.8) months in the RT group (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.87; P = .008). No difference was observed in grades 3 or 4 adverse events. Patients with EGFR overexpression had a significantly better median overall survival (not reached vs 16.3 months [range, 2.6-45.1 months]; P = .03) in the RT plus icotinib group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, icotinib plus RT was well tolerated and improved OS in older patients with ESCC relative to RT alone. Patients with EGFR overexpression benefitted more from icotinib with RT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02375581.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.