ArticlePersonalized medicine2020
Engaging community stakeholders in research on best practices for clinical genomic sequencing.
Article in Personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Question prompt lists and caregiver question asking in pediatric specialty appointments: A randomized controlled trial.Patient education and counseling · 2023Trial
- Trial
- The Many Faces of Engagement: A Scoping Review of Paediatric Patient and Family Engagement in Clinical Care, Education and Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Exome sequencing early in outpatient evaluation in NCGENES 2: Changing the course of the diagnostic odyssey?HGG advances · 2026Article
- North Carolina primary care provider perspectives on expanded genomic screening in children.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Clinical exome sequencing efficacy and phenotypic expansions involving non-isolated congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT+).European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- A Community-Engaged Approach to Enhancing Participation in Genomic Research in Rare and Understudied Cancer Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.Research square · 2025Article
- Age-Based Genomic Screening: Pediatric Providers' Perspectives on Implementation.Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Methods for Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice.Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Using visual storytelling to share aggregate findings with families participating in clinical genomics research.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
- Age-Based Genomic Screening during Childhood: Ethical and Practical Considerations in Public Health Genomics Implementation.International journal of neonatal screening · 2023Article
- The social value of genomic sequencing for disadvantaged families facing rare disease.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022Article
- Integration of stakeholder engagement from development to dissemination in genomic medicine research: Approaches and outcomes from the CSER Consortium.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- Parental Guidance Suggested: Engaging Parents as Partners in Research Studies of Genomic Screening for a Pediatric Population.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Advancing precision public health using human genomics: examples from the field and future research opportunities.Genome medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.