Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026194›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2021

Timeliness of cancer care in a regional Victorian health service: A comparison of high-volume (Lung) and low-volume (oesophagogastric) tumour streams.

Mwila Kabwe, Amanda Robinson, Yachna Shethia, Carol Parker, Robert Blum, Ilana Solo, Michael Leach

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mwila KabweLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6321-9080
Amanda RobinsonLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Yachna ShethiaLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Carol ParkerLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Robert BlumLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Ilana SoloLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Michael LeachLoddon Mallee Integrated Cancer Service, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Bendigo Health · AULa Trobe University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimeliness of cancer care is vital for improved survival and quality of life of patients. Service and care centralisation at larger-volume centres has been associated with improved outcomes. However, there is a lack of systematic data on the impact of tumour stream volume on timeliness of care.

aimsTo investigate and compare timeliness of care for lung cancer, a high-volume (more commonly diagnosed) tumour stream, and oesophagogastric (OG) cancer, a low-volume (less commonly diagnosed) tumour stream, at a regional health service in Victoria, Australia.

methodsA retrospective cohort study comprising random samples of 75 people newly diagnosed with lung cancer (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 [ICD-10] diagnosis codes C34 in the Victorian Cancer Registry [VCR]) and 50 people newly diagnosed with OG cancer (ICD-10 diagnosis codes C15 or C16 in VCR) at one regional Victorian health service between 2016 and 2017. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between patient factors and suboptimal timeliness of care.

resultsIn comparison to OG cancer patients, lung cancer patients had reduced odds of suboptimal timeliness of care in reference to times outside OCP for referral to diagnosis (OR [95% CI] = 0.34 [0.14 to 0.83]) but increased odds of suboptimal timeliness for diagnosis to treatment (OR [95% CI] = 2.48 [1.01 to 6.09]).

conclusionIn the low-volume OG cancer stream, patients had longer wait times from referral to an MDM, where treatment decisions occur, but shorter time to commencement of first treatment. Conversely in the high-volume lung cancer group, there was delayed initiation of first treatment following presentation at MDM. There is need to explore ways to fast-track MDM presentation and commencement of therapy among people diagnosed with low-volume and high-volume cancers, respectively.

Indexed as

AgedEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRegional Medical ProgramsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTime-to-TreatmentVictorialung canceroesophagogastric canceroptimal care pathwaytimeliness of care

Identifiers

PMID33026194
PMCPMC7941434
OpenAlexW3092214965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.