Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33026106›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2020

The effect of different cutoff schemes in molecular simulations of proteins.

Matthias Diem, Chris Oostenbrink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Effect of CuACS chemical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effect of Microwaves on Protein Structure: Molecular Dynamics Approach.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EfficientJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthias DiemInstitute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Chris OostenbrinkInstitute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4232-2556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular simulations of nanoscale systems invariably involve assumptions and approximations to describe the electrostatic interactions, which are long-ranged in nature. One approach is the use of cutoff schemes with a reaction-field contribution to account for the medium outside the cutoff scheme. Recent reports show that macroscopic properties may depend on the exact choice of cutoff schemes in modern day simulations. In this work, a systematic analysis of the effects of different cutoff schemes was performed using a set of 52 proteins. We find no statistically significant differences between using a twin-range or a single-range cutoff scheme. Applying the cutoff based on charge groups or based on atomic positions, does lead to significant differences, which is traced to the cutoff noise for energies and forces. While group-based cutoff schemes show increased cutoff noise in the potential energy, applying an atomistic cutoff leads to artificial structure in the solvent at the cutoff distance. Carefully setting the temperature control, or using an atomistic cutoff for the solute and a group-based cutoff for the solvent significantly reduces the effects of the cutoff noise, without introducing structure in the solvent. This study aims to deepen the understanding of the implications different cutoffs have on molecular dynamics simulations.

Indexed as

Molecular ConformationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsSolventsStatic ElectricityTemperatureThermodynamicsProteinsSolventsatomisticcharge-groupcutoff schememolecular dynamicsproteins

Identifiers

PMID33026106
PMCPMC7756334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.