ArticleSaudi medical journal2020
The current practice of using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in diabetic hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Is there a room for vitamin D?
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comment on: The current practice of using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in diabetic hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Is there a room for vitamin D?Saudi medical journal · 2021Article
- Comment on: The current practice of using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in diabetic hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Is there a room for vitamin D?Saudi medical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the current pattern of using angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in diabetic nephropathy (DN), and assess physician awareness of using vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of DN.
methodsA cross-sectional study implementing a validated questionnaire, which was distributed to physicians in the aforementioned specialties in 3 hospitals in Saudi Arabia (Almanee Hospital, King Saud Medical City [KSMC], and Riyadh Care Hospital [RCH]) between April 2019 and November 2019. We used IBM SPSS 26.0 to perform descriptive statistical analyses and comparisons were based on the Chi-square test.
resultsForty-one physicians (30%) reported the use of combination therapy of ACEi and ARBs. Fifty-six (41%) physicians reported that they never used vitamin D in the treatment of DN, and 48% agreed that vitamin D can benefit patients with DN. 52% of the respondents reported the existence of guidelines. The vast majority (94%) recommended clearer guidelines on monitoring renal function in patients treated with ACEi or ARBs.
conclusionThere is a universal agreement among physicians regarding the use of ACEi and ARBs for the treatment of DN with limited awareness of the bene ts of using vitamin D. Hence, the development of specific guidelines for its use are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.