Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025843›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Efficacy of Combination Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Regional Inductive Moderate Hyperthermia in the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Anton Loboda, Ivan Smolanka, Valerii E Orel, Liubov Syvak, Tetiana Golovko, Iryna Dosenko, Andrii Lyashenko, Ivan Smolanka, Olha Dasyukevich, Tetiana Tarasenko and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anton LobodaNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ivan SmolankaNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Valerii E OrelNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-6319-4215
Liubov SyvakNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana GolovkoNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Iryna DosenkoNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Andrii LyashenkoNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ivan SmolankaNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Olha DasyukevichNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana TarasenkoNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Valerii B OrelNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Alex RykhalskyiNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Oleksandr GanichNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Oleksandr MokhonkoBiomedical Engineering Department, "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute," Kyiv, Ukraine.
National Cancer Institute · UANational Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with regional inductive moderate hyperthermia for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND

methods200 patients with stage IIB-IIIA breast cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (control group, n = 97) or chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia (experimental group, n = 103). Inductive hyperthermia was set at 27.12 ± 0.16 MHz and the 50 W output power.

resultsThermal and color Doppler ultrasound imaging demonstrated that hyperthermia increased the surface temperature on the breasts to < 4°С while the mean values for systolic blood flow were 3.5 times as high as those prior to treatment. Assessment of tumor size and response found a (31.24 ± 3.85)% reduction in the size of the primary tumor in patients receiving chemotherapy + hyperthermia, while chemotherapy alone showed a (22.95 ± 3.61)% decrease on average (p = 0.034). The rate of objective response increased by 15.9% in the experimental group (р = 0.034) compared with the control group. The patients in the experimental group also had axillary lymph node regression of 14.17% greater than in the control group (p = 0.011). Moreover, the combination treatment allowed to increase the proportion of women eligible for breast-conserving and reconstructive surgery by 13.63% in the experimental group. The viable tumor volume was lower in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy + hyperthermia (24.4 ± 0.2)% compared with those given chemotherapy alone (30.4 ± 0.25)%. The 10-year overall survival rates were higher (log-rank: p = 0.009) in breast cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia than in patients receiving chemotherapy only.

conclusionThe combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the technology of regional inductive moderate hyperthermia improved the efficacy of treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer staged IIB-IIIA.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDoxorubicinFemaleHumansHypothermia, InducedLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTumor BurdenDoxorubicinbreast cancerchemotherapycombination treatmentcomputer-assisted treatment planninginductive hyperthermia

Identifiers

PMID33025843
PMCPMC7545767
OpenAlexW3092483106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.