ArticleThe European journal of general practice2020
Paediatric emergency department visits for non-urgent conditions: Can family medicine prevent this?
Article in The European journal of general practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Leaving without being seen and against medical advice from the pediatric emergency department: a single-center retrospective cohort study in Türkiye.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Parents of Children Admitted to the Paediatric Emergency Department with Fever.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-center retrospective analysis of potentially non-urgent emergency department visits in Israel using a nationwide dataset.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Beyond clinical urgency: parental awareness, educational level, and non-urgent pediatric emergency department utilization.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Caregiver alignment with triage acuity levels and drivers for discrepancy between caregiver assessment and triage acuity levels: a cross-sectional questionnaire based study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Supporting infants and parents in the perinatal period (SIPP): Co-creating an improved journey.PloS one · 2025Article
- The role of family health centres in preventing paediatric emergency department usage of parents of children with non-urgent conditions.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- Analysis of factors conditioning inappropriate visits in a paediatric emergency department.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Factors Relating to Decision Delay in the Emergency Department: Effects of Diagnostic Tests and Consultations.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2023Article
- Nonurgent Visits to the Pediatric Emergency Department before and during the First Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Turkey, family physicians serve only during office hours, while emergency services have 7/24 free access. Non-urgent patients commonly use Paediatric Emergency departments (PEDs). In Turkey, there is little evidence as to why emergency services are used instead of family medicine for non-urgent paediatric healthcare.
objectivesTo evaluate the causes and factors affecting non-urgent PED visits. To determine the reason for non-use of family medicine for non-urgent paediatric healthcare.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study at Gaziantep University PED between April and May 2019. We administered a questionnaire to the parents of children (from one month to 16 years) triaged to non-urgent (level-5) using a 5-level triage system.
resultsA total of 457 parents were surveyed. The average patient age was 6.5 ± 4.7 years and 24.5% had a chronic disease. One-third of the parents (33.7%) considered their children's condition 'very urgent'. The most important reason for preferring PED (42.5%) instead of family physician or alternative health facilities was the thought that the condition of children would worsen. Two hundred fifty-three (55.4%) of the patients presented outside working hours. Although 58.9% of parents were satisfied with the family physician, most (67.8%) stated that they preferred other specialists rather than family physicians when the child had health problems. Fathers who were primary school graduates were more likely to prefer other specialists than family physicians.
conclusionParents' perception of urgency and the thought that their child's condition will worsen are the main reasons for non-urgent using PED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.