Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025724›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2021

A worldwide survey on proctological practice during COVID-19 lockdown (ProctoLock 2020): a cross-sectional analysis.

Gaetano Gallo, Alessandro Sturiale, Veronica De Simone, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Iacopo Giani, Ugo Grossi, ProctoLock 2020 Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Anoplasty for anatomical anal stenosis: systematic review of complications and recurrences.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patients waiting lists and the COVID-19 pandemic: A moral dilemma.Perioperative care and operating room management · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gaetano GalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1066-4671
Alessandro SturialeProctology and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-0933
Veronica De SimoneProctology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Gian Luca Di TannaThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Iacopo GianiSOSD Proctologia USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy.
Ugo GrossiIV Surgery Unit, Treviso Regional Hospital, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
ProctoLock 2020 Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimProctology is one of the surgical specialties that has suffered the most during COVID-19 pandemic. Using a cross-sectional non-incentivised World Wide Web survey, we aimed to snapshot the current status of proctological practice in six world regions.

methodSurgeons affiliated to renowned scientific societies with an interest in coloproctology were invited to join the survey. Members of the ProctoLock Working Group enhanced recruitment by direct invitation. The predictive power of respondents' and hospitals' demographics on the change of status of surgical and outpatient activities was calculated.

resultsRespondents (n = 1050) were mostly men (79%), with a mean age of 46.9 years, at consultant level (79%), practising in academic hospitals (53%) offering a dedicated proctology service (68%). A total of 119 (11%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The majority (54%) came from Europe. Participants from Asia reported a higher proportion of unaltered practice (17%), while those from Europe had the highest proportion of fully stopped practice (20%). The likelihood of ongoing surgical practice was higher in men (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.13-2.09; P = 0.006), in those reporting readily availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) (OR 1.40, 1.08-1.42; P = 0.012) and in centres that were partially or not at all involved in COVID-19 care (OR 2.95, 2.14-4.09; P < 0.001). This chance decreased by 2% per year of respondent's age (P = 0.001).

conclusionSeveral factors including different screening policies and resource capacity affected the current status of proctological practice. This information may help health authorities to formulate effective preventive strategies to limit curtailment of care of these patients during the pandemic.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlAdultColorectal SurgeryCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19EuropeItalyLockdownProctoLock2020ProctologySARS-COV-2Worldwide

Identifiers

PMID33025724
PMCPMC7675501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.