Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025640›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2021

Predicting likelihood of in vivo chemotherapy response in canine lymphoma using ex vivo drug sensitivity and immunophenotyping data in a machine learning model.

Zach Bohannan, Raghavendra Sumanth Pudupakam, Jamin Koo, Harrison Horwitz, Josephine Tsang, Amanda Polley, Enyang James Han, Elmer Fernandez, Stanley Park, Deanna Swartzfager and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Progression of primary mediastinal T-cell lymphoma to a multicentric form in a young dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zach BohannanImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-9668
Raghavendra Sumanth PudupakamImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Jamin KooImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Harrison HorwitzImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Josephine TsangImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Amanda PolleyImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Enyang James HanImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Elmer FernandezImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Stanley ParkImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Deanna SwartzfagerImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Nicholas Seah Xi QiImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Chantal TuSAGE Veterinary Centers, Dublin, California, USA.
Wendi Velando RankinSAGE Veterinary Centers, Dublin, California, USA.
Douglas H ThammFlint Animal Cancer Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Hye-Ryeon LeeImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Sungwon LimImpriMed, Inc., Palo Alto, California, USA.
Palo Alto Institute · USThe Centers · USColorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a precision medicine platform that evaluates the probability of chemotherapy drug efficacy for canine lymphoma by combining ex vivo chemosensitivity and immunophenotyping assays with computational modelling. We isolated live cancer cells from fresh fine needle aspirates of affected lymph nodes and collected post-treatment clinical responses in 261 canine lymphoma patients scheduled to receive at least 1 of 5 common chemotherapy agents (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, lomustine and rabacfosadine). We used flow cytometry analysis for immunophenotyping and ex vivo chemosensitivity testing. For each drug, 70% of treated patients were randomly selected to train a random forest model to predict the probability of positive Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) clinical response based on input variables including antigen expression profiles and treatment sensitivity readouts for each patient's cancer cells. The remaining 30% of patients were used to test model performance. Most models showed a test set ROC-AUC > 0.65, and all models had overall ROC-AUC > 0.95. Predicted response scores significantly distinguished (P < .001) positive responses from negative responses in B-cell and T-cell disease and newly diagnosed and relapsed patients. Patient groups with predicted response scores >50% showed a statistically significant reduction (log-rank P < .05) in time to complete response when compared to the groups with scores <50%. The computational models developed in this study enabled the conversion of ex vivo cell-based chemosensitivity assay results into a predicted probability of in vivo therapeutic efficacy, which may help improve treatment outcomes of individual canine lymphoma patients by providing predictive estimates of positive treatment response.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleImmunophenotypingLymph NodesLymphomaMachine LearningMaleModels, BiologicalPredictive Value of TestsAntineoplastic Agentschemosensitivitydoglymphosarcomamachine learningprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID33025640
PMCPMC7894155
OpenAlexW3091827704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.