ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2021
Predicting likelihood of in vivo chemotherapy response in canine lymphoma using ex vivo drug sensitivity and immunophenotyping data in a machine learning model.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rescue Protocols for Canine Non-Indolent B Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Genomic-guided precision oncology in canine cancer: from comparative genomics to liquid biopsy and molecular monitoring.Journal of veterinary science · 2026Review
- Progression of primary mediastinal T-cell lymphoma to a multicentric form in a young dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026Article
- The application of artificial intelligence in veterinary oncology: a scoping review.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Ex Vivo Traceability Platform for Phospholipoproteomic Formulations: Functional Evidence Without Clinical Exposure.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Identification of novel genetic mutations for the treatment prognostication of canine lymphoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Recent advances in and applications of ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis for blood cancers.Blood research · 2024Review
- Morphology and multiparameter flow cytometry combined for integrated lymphoma diagnosis on small volume samples: possibilities and limitations.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Review
- Prognostic Utility of the Flow Cytometry and Clonality Analysis Results for Feline Lymphomas.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- ChatGPT in veterinary medicine: a practical guidance of generative artificial intelligence in clinics, education, and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Multimodal machine learning models identify chemotherapy drugs with prospective clinical efficacy in dogs with relapsed B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Investigating PSMA differential expression in canine uroepithelial carcinomas to aid disease-based stratification and guide therapeutic selection.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Predicting Dynamic Clinical Outcomes of the Chemotherapy for Canine Lymphoma Patients Using a Machine Learning Model.Veterinary sciences · 2021Article
- Predicting likelihood of in vivo chemotherapy response in canine lymphoma using ex vivo drug sensitivity and immunophenotyping data in a machine learning model.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a precision medicine platform that evaluates the probability of chemotherapy drug efficacy for canine lymphoma by combining ex vivo chemosensitivity and immunophenotyping assays with computational modelling. We isolated live cancer cells from fresh fine needle aspirates of affected lymph nodes and collected post-treatment clinical responses in 261 canine lymphoma patients scheduled to receive at least 1 of 5 common chemotherapy agents (doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, lomustine and rabacfosadine). We used flow cytometry analysis for immunophenotyping and ex vivo chemosensitivity testing. For each drug, 70% of treated patients were randomly selected to train a random forest model to predict the probability of positive Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) clinical response based on input variables including antigen expression profiles and treatment sensitivity readouts for each patient's cancer cells. The remaining 30% of patients were used to test model performance. Most models showed a test set ROC-AUC > 0.65, and all models had overall ROC-AUC > 0.95. Predicted response scores significantly distinguished (P < .001) positive responses from negative responses in B-cell and T-cell disease and newly diagnosed and relapsed patients. Patient groups with predicted response scores >50% showed a statistically significant reduction (log-rank P < .05) in time to complete response when compared to the groups with scores <50%. The computational models developed in this study enabled the conversion of ex vivo cell-based chemosensitivity assay results into a predicted probability of in vivo therapeutic efficacy, which may help improve treatment outcomes of individual canine lymphoma patients by providing predictive estimates of positive treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.