Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025521›Full record

ArticleInfection2021

An approach to lifting self-isolation for health care workers with prolonged shedding of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

H Laferl, H Kelani, T Seitz, B Holzer, I Zimpernik, A Steinrigl, F Schmoll, C Wenisch, F Allerberger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Comparative evaluation of four SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in hospitalized patients.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H Laferl4th Medical Department with Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, 1100, Vienna, Austria. hermann.laferl@gesundheitsverbund.at.
H Kelani4th Medical Department with Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, 1100, Vienna, Austria.
T Seitz4th Medical Department with Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, 1100, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-2240
B HolzerAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Veterinary Disease Control Mödling, 2340, Mödling, Austria.
I ZimpernikAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Veterinary Disease Control Mödling, 2340, Mödling, Austria.
A SteinriglAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Veterinary Disease Control Mödling, 2340, Mödling, Austria.
F SchmollAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Veterinary Disease Control Mödling, 2340, Mödling, Austria.
C Wenisch4th Medical Department with Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, 1100, Vienna, Austria.
F AllerbergerAustrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES), Institute for Veterinary Disease Control Mödling, 2340, Mödling, Austria.
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety · ATKaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital · ATWiener Krankenanstaltenverbund · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccording to the European Public Health Authority guidance for ending isolation in the context of COVID-19, a convalescent healthcare worker (HCW) can end their isolation at home and resume work upon clinical improvement and two negative RT-PCR tests from respiratory specimens obtained at 24-h intervals at least 8 days after the onset of symptoms. However, convalescent HCWs may shed SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA for prolonged periods.

methods40 healthy HCWs off work because of ongoing positive RT-PCR results in combined nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs following SARS-CoV-2 infection were invited to participate in this study. These HCWs had been in self-isolation because of a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. NP and OP swabs as well as a blood sample were collected from each participant. RT-PCR and virus isolation was performed with each swab sample and serum neutralization test as well as two different ELISA tests were performed on all serum samples.

resultsNo viable virions could be detected in any of 29 nasopharyngeal and 29 oropharyngeal swabs taken from 15 long-time carriers. We found SARSCoV- 2 RNA in 14/29 nasopharyngeal and 10/29 oropharyngeal swabs obtained from screening 15 HCWs with previous COVID-19 up to 55 days after symptom onset. Six (40%) of the 15 initially positive HCWs converted to negative and later reverted to positive again according to their medical records. All but one HCW, a healthy volunteer banned from work, showed the presence of neutralizing antibodies in concomitantly taken blood samples. Late threshold cycle (Ct) values in RT-PCR [mean 37.4; median 37.3; range 30.8-41.7] and the lack of virus growth in cell culture indicate that despite the positive PCR results no infectivity remained.

conclusionWe recommend lifting isolation if the RT-PCR Ct-value of a naso- or oropharyngeal swab sample is over 30. Positive results obtained from genes targeted with Ct-values > 30 correspond to non-viable/noninfectious particles that are still detected by RT-PCR. In case of Ct-values lower than 30, a blood sample from the patient should be tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. If positive, non-infectiousness can also be assumed.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSARS-CoV-2Virus SheddingAdultCohort StudiesConvalescenceCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxNeutralization TestsCOVID-19Health care workerInfectiousnessIsolationSARS-CV-2

Identifiers

PMID33025521
PMCPMC7538033
OpenAlexW3091816327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.