ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020
Can frozen-thawed human ovary withstand refreezing-rethawing in the form of cortical strips?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revascularization of human ovarian cortical grafts is not equally efficient from both sides of the cortex tissue.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- RNA Transcripts in Human Ovarian Cells: Two-Time Cryopreservation Does Not Affect Developmental Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Transplantation of Refrozen Ovarian Cortical Strips Retrieved from a Cryopreserved Whole Ovary: Proof of Feasibility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Proceedings of the Oncofertility Congress of the "Freezing Ovarian Tissue and Oocytes" (FOTO) Consortium Brussels.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to elucidate whether ovarian tissue is able to withstand a double freezing-thawing procedure.
methodsHuman ovarian cortical biopsies from 4 thawed whole ovaries were divided into 4 experimental subgroups: (a) frozen-thawed non-grafted group, (b) frozen-thawed xenografted group, (c) refrozen-rethawed non-grafted group, and (d) refrozen-rethawed xenografted group. Xenografting was performed using 8 severe combined immunodeficient mice for a total duration of 21 days. The following analyses were conducted: classic hematoxylin and eosin staining, Ki67 immunolabeling, transmission electron microscopy, Masson's green trichrome, and double CD34 immunostaining.
resultsMorphologically normal preantral follicles were detected in all groups. We observed a dramatic decline of more than 65% in early preantral follicle survival rates after grafting of both frozen-thawed (p < 0.0001) and refrozen-rethawed (p < 0.0001) ovarian tissue. However, mean follicle densities remained comparable between the frozen-thawed and refrozen-rethawed non-grafted groups, as well as both grafted groups. Equivalent proportions of proliferating early preantral follicles were identified in frozen-thawed and refrozen-rethawed samples, whether the tissue was grafted or not. Furthermore, we did not observe any significant difference in atretic follicle rates between any of the four groups, and the ultrastructural quality of follicles appeared unaffected by the refreezing procedure. Similar proportions of fibrosis were noted in the frozen-thawed and refrozen-rethawed groups, irrespective of grafting. Finally, no significant differences were witnessed in terms of vascularization.
conclusionWe were able to demonstrate, for the first time, that refrozen-rethawed ovarian tissue has the same functional characteristics as frozen-thawed ovarian tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.