Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025366›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Motion analysis of the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set using Robotics Video and Motion Assessment Software.

Alan Kawarai Lefor, Kanako Harada, Aristotelis Dosis, Mamoru Mitsuishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Machine Learning-Based Automated Assessment of Intracorporeal Suturing in Laparoscopic Fundoplication.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Depth over RGB: automatic evaluation of open surgery skills using depth camera.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Motion analysis of the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set II: learning curve analysis.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan Kawarai LeforDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. alefor@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-5630
Kanako HaradaDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Aristotelis DosisImperial College London, London, UK.
Mamoru MitsuishiDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe JIGSAWS dataset is a fixed dataset of robot-assisted surgery kinematic data used to develop predictive models of skill. The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationships of self-defined skill level with global rating scale scores and kinematic data (time, path length and movements) from three exercises (suturing, knot-tying and needle passing) (right and left hands) in the JIGSAWS dataset.

methodsGlobal rating scale scores are reported in the JIGSAWS dataset and kinematic data were calculated using ROVIMAS software. Self-defined skill levels are in the dataset (novice, intermediate, expert). Correlation coefficients (global rating scale-skill level and global rating scale-kinematic parameters) were calculated. Kinematic parameters were compared among skill levels.

resultsGlobal rating scale scores correlated with skill in the knot-tying exercise (r = 0.55, p = 0.0005). In the suturing exercise, time, path length (left) and movements (left) were significantly different (p < 0.05) for novices and experts. For knot-tying, time, path length (right and left) and movements (right) differed significantly for novices and experts. For needle passing, no kinematic parameter was significantly different comparing novices and experts. The only kinematic parameter that correlated with global rating scale scores is time in the knot-tying exercise.

conclusionGlobal rating scale scores weakly correlate with skill level and kinematic parameters. The ability of kinematic parameters to differentiate among self-defined skill levels is inconsistent. Additional data are needed to enhance the dataset and facilitate subset analyses and future model development.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceRobotic Surgical ProceduresSimulation TrainingSoftwareBiomechanical PhenomenaGesturesHumansLaparoscopyMotionSuturesSuture TechniquesJIGSAWSMotion analysisROVIMAS

Identifiers

PMID33025366
PMCPMC7671974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.