Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025255›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Predictors and rates of prior endoscopic tattoo localization amongst individuals undergoing elective colorectal resections for benign and malignant lesions.

Olivia Hershorn, Jason Park, Harminder Singh, Kathleen Clouston, Ashley Vergis, Ramzi M Helewa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia HershornSection of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Tache Avenue, Z3049-409, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada. hershoro@myumanitoba.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-8667
Jason ParkSection of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Tache Avenue, Z3049-409, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
Harminder SinghSection of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kathleen CloustonSection of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Tache Avenue, Z3049-409, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
Ashley VergisSection of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Tache Avenue, Z3049-409, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
Ramzi M HelewaSection of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Tache Avenue, Z3049-409, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada. rhelewa@sbgh.mb.ca.
University of Manitoba · CAVictoria General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate tattooing of suspicious lesions during colonoscopy is critical for surgical planning. However, variability exists in tattoo placement, technique, and reporting. Our aim is to determine the rates and predictors of tattoo placement, tattoo location in relation to the lesion, and localization accuracy during lower endoscopy for individuals undergoing elective colorectal resections.

methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review on all patients undergoing elective colorectal resections for benign and malignant neoplasms between 2007 and 2017 at a high volume Canadian tertiary centre. Patient demographics, endoscopic, and tumour-related characteristics were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of tattoo localization.

resultsOf the 1062 patients identified, laparoscopic resection occurred in 59% of patients. 57% of patients underwent tattooing for tumour localization at index endoscopy. Tattoos were placed distal (27%), both proximal and distal (4%), and just proximal (2%) to the lesion. However, in the majority of cases the tattoo location was not documented (67%). On multivariate analysis, patients who had lesions located in the transverse colon (OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.04-3.59), had surgery performed after 2010 (2011-2014: OR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.31-2.68; 2015-2017: OR: 2.87, 95% CI 1.93-4.26), underwent laparoscopic resections (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.22-2.33), and had their index endoscopy performed in an urban setting (OR: 5.92, 95% CI 3.23-10.87), were at higher odds of having a tattoo placed at index endoscopy.

conclusionEndoscopic tattoo placement and location in relation to the lesion varies widely, with reports containing suboptimal documentation. Lesion location and laparoscopic procedures were significant predictors of tattoo placement. This study highlights the need for standardized tattooing practices and reporting amongst endoscopists. One of the focus of quality improvement efforts should be educational initiatives for rural endoscopists.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsTattooingCanadaColonoscopyHumansRetrospective StudiesColonoscopyColorectal cancerEndoscopyTattoo localization

Identifiers

PMID33025255
OpenAlexW3092303941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.