Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025249›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Addressing the gap in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration training for rural surgeons: imparting procedural ability is not enough.

Ryan A J Campagna, Allison M Belette, Amy L Holmstrom, Amy L Halverson, Byron F Santos, Eric S Hungness, Ezra N Teitelbaum

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Upfront Laparoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: What Are the Risk Factors of Failure?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan A J CampagnaDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. ryan.campagna@northwestern.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2486-7341
Allison M BeletteDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Amy L HolmstromDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Amy L HalversonDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Byron F SantosDepartment of Surgery, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Eric S HungnessDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ezra N TeitelbaumDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Training Grant in Gastrointestinal Physiology and PsychologyT32DK101363 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2014 to 2018
$1.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is an underutilized therapy for choledocholithiasis. The driving factors of this practice gap are poorly defined. We sought to evaluate the attitudes and practice patterns of surgeons who underwent training courses using an LCBDE simulator.

methodsSurgeons completed a half-day simulator-based LCBDE curriculum at national courses, including the American College of Surgeons Advanced Skills Training for Rural Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons annual meeting. Attitudes were assessed with Likert surveys immediately before and after curriculum completion. Follow-up surveys were distributed electronically.

results159 surgeons completed training during six courses. Surgeon attitudes regarding the overall superiority of LCBDE vs. ERCP shifted towards favoring LCBDE after course participation (4.0 vs 3.3; Likert scale 1-5, p < 0.001). 44% of surgeons completed follow-up surveys at a mean of 3 years post-course. Surgeons remained confident in their ability to perform LCBDE, with only 14% rating their skill as a significant barrier to practice, as compared with 43% prior to course participation (p < 0.01). However, only 28% of surgeons saw an increase in LCBDE volume. Deficiencies in operating room (OR) staff knowledge and instrument availability were the most significant barriers to post-course practice implementation and were inversely correlated with LCBDE case volume (ρ = - 0.44 and - 0.47, both p < 0.01). Surgeons for whom OR staff knowledge of LCBDE was not a significant barrier performed nearly 4 times more LCBDE than those who rated staff knowledge as a moderate, strong, or complete barrier.

conclusionsSurgeons trained at an LCBDE course retained long-term confidence in their procedural ability. Practice implementation was hindered by deficiencies in OR staff knowledge and instrument availability. Surgeons with knowledgeable operating room staff performed significantly more LCBDEs than those with less capable assistance. These barriers should be addressed in future curricula to improve procedural adoption.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholedocholithiasisLaparoscopySurgeonsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCommon Bile DuctCurriculumHumansRetrospective StudiesBile ductPractice barrierRuralSimulation

Identifiers

PMID33025249
OpenAlexW3092318619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.