SynthesisParasitology research2020
World-wide prevalence of Anisakis larvae in fish and its relationship to human allergic anisakiasis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Parasitology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methods for the detection of anisakid material in different food matrices: A systematic review.Food and waterborne parasitology · 2026Review
- Article
- Evolution of Animal Parasitism in Nematodes of the Suborder Spirurina.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Parasites of Arctic char (Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2026Article
- A fast and reliable molecular method to detect Anisakidae in zooplanktonic Euphausiacea.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2026Article
- Decision-making and public health: How the prevalence ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025Article
- Article
- Long-term host parasite dynamics in eight odontocete species from south-eastern South Africa.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025Article
- Food Safety Concerns:Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence of IgG and IgE Antibodies AgainstAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transmission of parasites to people via food: how can we determine their impact and why do we need to know?Food and waterborne parasitology · 2025Review
- Immunogenicity ofEwha medical journal · 2025Article
- IgE-Crosslinking-Induced Luciferase Expression Test as a Sensitive Indicator ofAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Anisakidae and Anisakidosis: A Public Health Perspective.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anisakid nematode larvae in freshwater fishes in the St. Lawrence River (Québec, Canada).International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024Article
- Detection and Characterization of Visceral Anisakid Nematodes in Blue Whiting from Portuguese Waters.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hyperspectral imaging and deep learning for parasite detection in white fish under industrial conditions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Anisakiasis in Madrid (Spain) after 20 Years of Preventive Legislation.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The infective stage of Anisakidae nematodes responsible for allergic reactions in humans is found in a variety of edible fish and cephalopods. The identification of geographical regions that are high risk for infected seafood may help prevent allergic reactions in humans. Despite an abundance of published literature which has identified anisakid larvae in an array of edible seafood as well as scattered reports of human allergic anisakiasis, the relationship between the two has not been fully explored. Therefore, a systematic spatio-temporal study was conducted to determine the prevalence of Anisakis spp. in fish from January 2000 to August 2020 firstly to explore the relationship between fish infection and cases of allergic anisakiasis and secondly to use fish infection data to map potential allergic anisakiasis 'hot spots'. A systematic literature search for original English text articles was conducted through search engines, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholar. Out of 3228 articles which describe anisakid infection in fish, 264 were used for data extraction. Of 904 articles describing allergic anisakiasis, 37 were used for data extraction. A qualitative summary of the extracted data was performed using equal interval method (ArcMap software) in order to compare the global distribution of Anisakis-infected fish. Of the 152-identified fish hosts, five families were most commonly infected with Anisakis spp. These included Lophiidae (86.9%), Trichiuridae (77.05%), Zeidae (70.9%), Merlucciidae (67.8%) and Gadidae (56.8%). The hot spot areas for allergic anisakiasis were North and northeast of Atlantic Ocean, southwest of USA, west of Mexico, south of Chile, east of Argentina, Norway, UK and west of Iceland (confidence 99%). The highest rate of allergic anisakiasis was in Portugal and Norway with the prevalence rate of 18.45-22.50%. Allergologists should consider allergic anisakiasis as a public health issue particularly in high-risk countries where high prevalences in fish have been demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33025215What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.