ReviewNeurosurgical review2021
Management of unruptured incidentally found intracranial saccular aneurysms.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Role of miRNA Expression Profiles in Different Biofluids in Aneurysm Rupture.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
- Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge- safety and efficacy.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular decision-making: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4 and multidisciplinary expert recommendations for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- The value of systemic immune inflammation index, white blood cell to platelet ratio, and homocysteine in predicting the instability of small saccular intracranial aneurysms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mimicking aneurysm in a patient with chronic occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms occur in 3-5% of the general population. As the use of diagnostic medical imaging has steadily increased over the past few decades with the increased availability of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), so has the detection of incidental aneurysms. The management of an unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysm is challenging for both patients and physicians, as the decision to intervene must weigh the risk of rupture and resultant subarachnoid hemorrhage against the risk inherent to the surgical or endovascular procedure. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of factors to be considered in the decision to offer treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in adults. In addition, we review aneurysm and patient characteristics that favor surgical clipping over endovascular intervention and vice versa. Finally, the authors propose a novel, simple, and clinically relevant algorithm for observation versus intervention in unruptured intracranial aneurysms based on the PHASES scoring system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.