ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Adaptive Voxel Matching for Temporal CT Subtraction.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal subtraction (TS) technique calculates a subtraction image between a pair of registered images acquired from the same patient at different times. Previous studies have shown that TS is effective for visualizing pathological changes over time; therefore, TS should be a useful tool for radiologists. However, artifacts caused by partial volume effects degrade the quality of thick-slice subtraction images, even with accurate image registration. Here, we propose a subtraction method for reducing artifacts in thick-slice images and discuss its implementation in high-speed processing. The proposed method is based on voxel matching, which reduces artifacts by considering gaps in discretized positions of two images in subtraction calculations. There are two different features between the proposed method and conventional voxel matching: (1) the size of a searching region to reduce artifacts is determined based on discretized position gaps between images and (2) the searching region is set on both images for symmetrical subtraction. The proposed method is implemented by adopting an accelerated subtraction calculation method that exploit the nature of liner interpolation for calculating the signal value at a point among discretized positions. We quantitatively evaluated the proposed method using synthetic data and qualitatively using clinical data interpreted by radiologists. The evaluation showed that the proposed method was superior to conventional methods. Moreover, the processing speed using the proposed method was almost unchanged from that of the conventional methods. The results indicate that the proposed method can improve the quality of subtraction images acquired from thick-slice images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.