Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025135›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Current perspectives on imaging and treatment of juvenile angiofibromas : A review].

Maximilian Linxweiler, Umut Yilmaz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximilian LinxweilerKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland.
Umut YilmazKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Gebäude 90.4, 66421, Homburg, Deutschland. umut.yilmaz@uks.eu.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueJuvenile angiofibroma is a benign tumor, whose surgical treatment may be complicated due to intraoperative hemorrhage. The tumors appear as well circumscribed, reddish masses, which often extend into the complete nasal cavity and nasopharynx. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsDiagnosis is based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with angiography to identify supplying blood vessels. STANDARD TREATMENT: Open resection. INNOVATION IN TREATMENT: The endoscopic endonasal resection is the therapy of choice and may be combined with open surgery after endovascular embolization. Radiation or hormone therapy are alternatives for patients with very advanced tumors or high surgical morbidity. Depending on location and age of the patients, residual tumors after surgery can be watched only or treated with radiotherapy. PERFORMANCE: Preoperative endovascular embolization lowers intraoperative blood loss by about 70%, induces tumor shrinkage, and facilitates resection. The endonasal approach will lower the peri- and postoperative morbidity. RECOMMENDATION: An endonasal approach combined with preoperative endovascular embolization should be preferred over open resection, but requires expertise as well as modern endoscopy and navigation equipment. MRI follow-ups should be performed regularly until after puberty. Recurrence after puberty is very uncommon.

Indexed as

AngiofibromaEmbolization, TherapeuticNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsEndoscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesEmbolizationEndoscopyMagnetic resonance tomographyRisk of bleedingSinonasal tumors

Identifiers

PMID33025135
OpenAlexW3091974884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.