Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025132›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2020

[Cervical CUP syndrome].

Frederik Fries

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utility ofClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frederik FriesKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland. frederik.fries@uks.eu.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term CUP syndrome (cancer of unknown primary) refers to a multifaceted clinical picture in which the affected patients have lymph node and/or distant metastases without the location of the primary tumor being known. The criteria of CUP syndrome are fulfilled if a histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy is present without a detectable primary tumor after completion of the primary diagnosis. Due to the usually poor prognosis and the manifold appearance, which often does not allow a standardized therapy, cervical CUP syndrome makes specific demands on clinical and imaging diagnostics. Using modern techniques such as positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), imaging plays a key role in the detection of a possible occult primary tumor as well as in staging and prognosis assessment.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Unknown PrimaryPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyDiagnostic ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsLymph nodesNeoplasm metastasisSquamous cell carcinomaStagingUnknown primary tumor

Identifiers

PMID33025132
OpenAlexW3092016457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.