Observational studyRheumatology international2021
Diagnosis and management of gout by clinicians in Nepal: a web-based survey.
Observational study in Rheumatology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding gout management among patients in Xiamen, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of gouty arthritis in the general population aged > 30.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Medical Students' Perspective and Knowledge of Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia and Gout Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with gout in Nepal are usually attended by medical graduates, family medicine, internists, and orthopedic surgeons. The study aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of point-of-care clinicians of Nepal regarding diagnosis and management of gout and assess the quality of treatment provided to the patients. A web-based descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among doctors managing gout patients. The questionnaire comprises 38 multiple choice questions; 9 questions for demographic data, 8, 11, and 10 questions each for knowledge, attitude, and practice, respectively. A pilot study was conducted to observe comprehensibility of the questionnaire before subjecting it to the participants. Ethical approval was obtained from review committee of National Center for Rheumatic diseases, Nepal. Simple descriptive statistics was used to describe the correct responses. Among 1200 clinicians invited, 32% (380) participated in the survey. Maximum respondents were of age group 25-45 years (82%) with majority being internists (43%). Although only 32% understood that the disease is not curable, knowledge regarding disease was acceptable in majority (60-90%). Around 83% denied attending any gout-related seminars and 34% denied being updated with the recent guidelines. The majority of postgraduates (72%) managed the cases themselves. Although there was acceptable practice accuracy on use of therapy for acute attacks (75%), target urate levels (57%), and use of urate-lowering agents (92%), they lacked in adequate screening of co-morbidities and initiation of long-term treatment. The point-of-care clinicians have adequate knowledge to diagnose and treat acute events. However, there is poor reflection in practice and frequent update of treatment guidelines is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33025111What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.