Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025077›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Impact of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Marcelo A Pinto, Tomaz J M Grezzana-Filho, Aljamir D Chedid, Ian Leipnitz, João E Prediger, Mário R Alvares-da-Silva, Alexandre de Araújo, Sofia Zahler, Bruno B Lopes, Ângelo Z D Giampaoli and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE-ON-CHRONIC LIVER FAILURE.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcelo A PintoLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Tomaz J M Grezzana-FilhoLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Aljamir D ChedidLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ian LeipnitzLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
João E PredigerLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Mário R Alvares-da-SilvaLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alexandre de AraújoLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sofia ZahlerLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Bruno B LopesLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ângelo Z D GiampaoliLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cleber R P KruelLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Marcio F ChedidLiver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. marciochedid@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6182-6963
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre 2018-0023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative blood salvage (IBS) with autologous blood transfusion is controversial in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated the role of IBS usage in LT for HCC.

methodsIn a retrospective cohort study at a single center from 2002 to 2018, the outcomes of LT surgery for HCC were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival of patients who received IBS were compared with those who did not receive IBS. Cancer recurrence, length of hospital stay, post-transplant complications, and blood loss also were evaluated. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate overall mid-term and long-term survival (4 and 6 years, respectively).

resultsOf the total 163 patients who underwent LT for HCC in the study period, 156 had complete demographic and clinical data and were included in the study. IBS was used in 122 and not used in 34 patients. Ninety-five (60.9%) patients were men, and the mean patient age was 58.5 ± 7.6 years. The overall 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year survival in the IBS group was 84.2%, 67.7%, and 56.8% vs. 85.3%, 67.5%, and 67.5% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.77). The 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year disease-free survival in the IBS group was 81.6%, 66.5%, and 55.4% vs. 85.3%, 64.1%, and 64.1% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.74). For patients without complete HCC necrosis (n = 121), the 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year overall survival rates for those who received IBS (n = 95) were 86.2%, 67.7%, and 49.6% vs. 84.6%, 70.0%, and 70.0% for 26 patients without IBS (p = 0.857). For the same patients, the 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year disease-free survival in the IBS group was 84.0%, 66.8%, and 64.0% vs. 88.0%, 72.8%, and 72.8% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.690).

conclusionIBS does not appear to be associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing LT for HCC, even in the presence of viable HCC in the explant. There seems to be no reason to contraindicate the use of IBS in LT for HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationOperative Blood SalvageHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesCell saverHepatocellular carcinomaIntraoperative blood cell salvageLiver transplantationOncologic recurrenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33025077
OpenAlexW3091883013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.