ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021
[Memory clinics in Germany-structural requirements and areas of responsibility].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Optimization of the work of outpatient memory clinics under aspects of value-based healthcare-An approach from the Center for Memory Disorders of the University Hospital Cologne].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Article
- [Introduction to the topic: analysis and optimization of the work of outpatient memory clinics].Der Nervenarzt · 2026Article
- The Use and Understanding of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Routine Specialist Care: A Survey Among German Memory Clinics.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- [Travel time to memory clinics in Bavaria: A geographical analyses within the framework of digiDEM Bayern].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024Article
- The Profile of the Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia in the Context of New Drugs in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMemory clinics (MC) are institutions specialized in the (differential) diagnostics, treatment, education, management and counseling of diseases related to dementia and their risk stages. In Germany, they have a variety of different organizational forms. Due to the growing diagnostic options in neurodegenerative diseases, the increasing demand for early detection and prediction as well as foreseeable new diagnostic procedures and disease-modifying treatment, it is important to standardize the structural prerequisites and areas of responsibility of MC.
objectiveThe article proposes structural and organizational requirements and procedures and a harmonized mode of operation for MC in Germany.
methodExpert consensus of psychiatrists, neurologists and geriatricians from academic and nonacademic institutions.
resultsThe MC should provide the specialist standards of psychiatry and/or neurology. They need to implement the recommendations of the national guidelines on dementia (S3LL) with respect to the (differential) diagnostics and treatment of dementia. With respect to the early detection and prediction of neurodegenerative disorders, they extend beyond the current German guideline standards. In MC, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is understood as an at-risk or prodromal stage of diseases related to dementia and biomarkers are consistently applied for etiological (early and differential) diagnostics. There is a requirement for close interaction with specialized diagnostic disciplines. Furthermore, MC should also offer comprehensive advice on social and legal issues and provide caregiver support. They should integrate current knowledge from research into care and serve as regional expert centers.
conclusionThe MC should implement evidence-based standards in diagnostics and treatment and introduce innovations in the care of patients with cognitive disorders and at-risk and prodromal stages. Their role in the German healthcare system must be strengthened. Sufficient and sustained funding needs to be established, since current reimbursement does not cover costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.