Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025067›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2021

Cancer potencies and margin of exposure used for comparative risk assessment of heated tobacco products and electronic cigarettes aerosols with cigarette smoke.

Gregory Rodrigo, Guy Jaccard, Donatien Tafin Djoko, Alexandra Korneliou, Marco Esposito, Maxim Belushkin

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Risk Assessment Models for Heated Tobacco Products.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Carbonyl emissions from heated tobacco products.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Risk Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. What Can Current Biomarker Data Tell Us About the Risks of Lung Cancer Posed by Heated Tobacco Products?Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  12. Use of quantitativeFrontiers in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gregory RodrigoPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Rue des Usines 56, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Guy JaccardPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Rue des Usines 56, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Guy.Jaccard@pmi.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6579-9832
Donatien Tafin DjokoPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Rue des Usines 56, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Alexandra KorneliouPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Rue des Usines 56, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Marco EspositoPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Rue des Usines 56, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Maxim BelushkinPMI R&D, Philip Morris Products S.A., Rue des Usines 56, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Philip Morris International (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health risk associated with the use of combustible cigarettes is well characterized and numerous epidemiological studies have been published for many years. Since more than a decade, innovative non-combusted tobacco products have emerged like heated tobacco products (HTP) or electronic cigarettes (EC). Long-term effects of these new products on health remain, however, unknown and there is a need to characterize associated potential health risks. The time dedicated to epidemiological data generation (at least 20 to 40 years for cancer endpoint), though, is not compatible with innovative development. Surrogates need, therefore, to be developed. In this work, non-cancer and cancer risks were estimated in a range of HTP and commercial combustible cigarettes based upon their harmful and potentially harmful constituent yields in aerosols and smoke, respectively. It appears that mean lifetime cancer risk values were decreased by more than one order of magnitude when comparing HTPs and commercial cigarettes, and significantly higher margin of exposure for non-cancer risk was observed for HTPs when compared to commercial cigarettes. The same approach was applied to two commercial ECs. Similar results were also found for this category of products. Despite uncertainties related to the factors used for the calculations and methodological limitations, this approach is valuable to estimate health risks associated to the use of innovative products. Moreover, it acts as predictive tool in absence of long-term epidemiological data. Furthermore, both cancer and non-cancer risks estimated for HTPs and ECs highlight the potential of reduced risk for non-combusted products when compared to cigarette smoking.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsCigarette SmokingE-Cigarette VaporHumansInhalation ExposureNeoplasmsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTobacco ProductsVapingAerosolsE-Cigarette VaporCancer potencyElectronic cigaretteHeated tobacco productMargin of exposure approachRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33025067
PMCPMC7811518
OpenAlexW3091867296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.