Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025055›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Patient-reported outcomes of meniscal repair and meniscectomy in patients 40 years of age and older show similar good results.

Ian D Engler, Julia R Moradian, Benjamin M Pockros, Carl M Schirmeister, John C Richmond, Matthew J Salzler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Delays in Orthopaedic Care and Inferior Outcomes after Meniscus Repair in Young Patients With Medicaid versus Commercial Insurance.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  5. Annual trends in arthroscopic meniscal surgery in Japan: 10-year analysis from 2014 to 2023.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Management of Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ian D EnglerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. IEngler@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2951-4991
Julia R MoradianTufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Benjamin M PockrosTufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Carl M SchirmeisterTufts University, 419 Boston Ave, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
John C RichmondNew England Baptist Hospital, 125 Parker Hill Ave, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Matthew J SalzlerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Tufts University · USTufts Medical Center · USNew England Baptist Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients aged 40 years and older who underwent meniscal repair or meniscectomy. All patients aged 40 and older who underwent a meniscal repair at a single institution from 2006 to 2017 were included. Meniscal repair cases were matched with a meniscectomy control group in a 1:3 ratio, selected for an equal proportion of concomitant ACL reconstruction in each group. PROMs, collected at a minimum follow-up of 24 months, included International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), Marx activity scale, and a patient satisfaction scale. The primary outcome was IKDC score, which was compared between groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Rate of failure, defined as repeat ipsilateral knee surgery or surgeon report of failure, was reported. Thirty-five meniscal repair patients and 131 meniscectomy patients were identified; 28 (80.0%) and 67 (51.1%) completed all PROMs with mean follow-up of 4.9 and 5.2 years, respectively. The mean age was 48.5 ± 7.0 years in the meniscal repair cohort and 52.8 ± 7.1 years in the meniscectomy cohort (p = 0.009). Concomitant ACL reconstruction was present in 46.4% and 49.3% of the meniscal repair and meniscectomy cohorts, respectively (n.s.). The median IKDC score was 78 (IQR 66, 87) in the repair cohort and 77 (IQR 56, 86) in the meniscectomy cohort (n.s.). The median Marx activity scale was 3.5 (IQR 0, 8) in the repair cohort and 3.0 (IQR 0, 9) in the meniscectomy cohort (n.s.). Over 85% of both groups were satisfied or very satisfied with no between-group differences (n.s.). In patients aged 40 years and older, patient-reported outcomes at an average of 5 years postoperatively were satisfactory and similar in patients undergoing meniscal repair and meniscectomy, indicating that age alone should not be a contraindication to meniscal repair.Level of evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeTibial Meniscus InjuriesAdultHumansMeniscectomyMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesAgeFailureMeniscal repairMeniscectomyMeniscusPatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33025055
OpenAlexW3091855107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.