Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33025052›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Patient-specific metal implants for focal chondral and osteochondral lesions in the knee; excellent clinical results at 2 years.

Johannes Holz, Tim Spalding, Tarek Boutefnouchet, Pieter Emans, Karl Eriksson, Mats Brittberg, Lars Konradsen, Clemens Kösters, Peter Verdonk, Magnus Högström and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Johannes HolzOrthoCentrum Hamburg, Hansastrasse 1-3, 20149, Hamburg, Germany. dr.holz@oc-h.de.
Tim SpaldingDepartment Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-8387
Tarek BoutefnouchetDepartment Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Coventry, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK.
Pieter EmansDepartment of Orthopaedics, Maastricht UMC+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Karl ErikssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Stockholm South Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats BrittbergCartilage Research Unit, University of Gothenburg, Region Halland Orthopaedics, Kungsbacka Hospital, 434 80, Kungsbacka, Sweden.
Lars KonradsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Bispebjerg, Denmark.
Clemens KöstersClinic for Orthopaedics, Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maria-Josef-Hospital Greven, Lindenstr. 29, 48268, Greven, Germany.
Peter VerdonkOrthoca, AZ Monica Hospitals, Harmoniestraat 68, 2018, Antwerp, Belgium.
Magnus HögströmSports Medicine Umeå AB and Orthopedics, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Martin LindDeptartment of Orthopedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Århus, Denmark.
University Hospital Coventry · GBAarhus University Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKCenter for Orthopaedics · USHallands sjukhus Kungsbacka · SEHamburg Institut (Germany) · DEJoint Research Center · BEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLSabbatsberg Hospital · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical treatment options for the management of focal chondral and osteochondral lesions in the knee include biological solutions and focal metal implants. A treatment gap exists for patients with lesions not suitable for arthroplasty or biologic repair or who have failed prior cartilage repair surgery. This study reports on the early clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing treatment with an individualised mini-metal implant for an isolated focal chondral defect in the knee.

methodsOpen-label, multicentre, non-randomised, non-comparative retrospective observational analysis of prospectively collected clinical data in a consecutive series of 80 patients undergoing knee reconstruction with the Episealer® implant. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and VAS scores, were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

resultsSeventy-five patients were evaluated at a minimum 24 months following implantation. Two patients had undergone revision (2.5%), 1 declined participation, and 2 had not completed the full data requirements, leaving 75 of the 80 with complete data for analysis. All 5 KOOS domain mean scores were significantly improved at 1 and 2 years (p < 0.001-0.002). Mean preoperative aggregated KOOS4 of 35 (95% CI 33.5-37.5) improved to 57 (95% CI 54.5-60.2) and 59 (95% CI 55.7-61.6) at 12 and 24 months respectively (p < 0.05). Mean VAS score improved from 63 (95% CI 56.0-68.1) preoperatively to 32 (95% CI 24.4-38.3) at 24 months. The improvement exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and this improvement was maintained over time. Location of defect and history of previous cartilage repair did not significantly affect the outcome (p > 0.05).

conclusionThe study suggests that at 2 years, Episealer® implants are safe with a low failure rate of 2.5% and result in clinically significant improvement. Individualised mini-metal implants with appropriate accurate guides for implantation appear to have a place in the management of focal femoral chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceRetrospective StudiesClinical outcomesCustomisedFocal cartilage lesionFocal knee resurfacingMetal implantsPersonalized

Identifiers

PMID33025052
PMCPMC8384793
OpenAlexW3092407792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.